Schuman H, Akiyama H, Knäuper B
University of Michigan, USA.
Memory. 1998 Jul;6(4):427-54. doi: 10.1080/741942611.
We investigate the collective memories of two samples drawn in 1991, one from the former West Germany and one from Yokohama, Japan. In the early 1990s such samples included many members of World War II cohorts and also cohorts born long after that war had ended. We consider the relation of age, conceptualised as birth cohort, to the salience of memories of national and world events that were mentioned as important in response to a quite general open-ended question about the past half-century. The relations are similar across the two countries in so far as external events like World War II might have had similar impacts on each population, while each country is distinctive with regard to events that especially impinged upon it. Hypotheses about the importance of adolescence and early adulthood to the imprinting of memories are generally confirmed, but several types of evidence suggest the need to extend the delimiting ages to earlier than the mid-teens and later than the mid-twenties. Other evidence indicates the desirability of distinguishing between recent events that are the focus of media attention and earlier events that depend more fully on autobiographical memory.
我们调查了1991年抽取的两个样本的集体记忆,一个来自前西德,另一个来自日本横滨。在20世纪90年代初,这些样本包括许多二战时期出生的人群,以及在二战结束后很久才出生的人群。我们将年龄(概念化为出生队列)与对国家和世界事件记忆的显著程度联系起来,这些事件是在回答一个关于过去半个世纪的相当宽泛的开放式问题时被提及为重要的。就像二战这样的外部事件可能对每个人口群体产生了类似影响而言,两国的这种关系是相似的,而每个国家在特别影响到它的事件方面是独特的。关于青春期和成年早期对记忆印记的重要性的假设总体上得到了证实,但几种类型的证据表明,需要将界定年龄范围扩大到比青少年中期更早和比二十多岁中期更晚。其他证据表明,区分作为媒体关注焦点的近期事件和更完全依赖自传体记忆的早期事件是可取的。