Tekcan Ali I, Boduroglu Aysecan, Mutlutürk Aysu, Aktan Erciyes Aslı
Department of Psychology, Bogazici University, Bebek, 34342, İstanbul, Turkey.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Oct;45(7):1095-1112. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0724-1.
Although substantial evidence exists showing a reliable reminiscence bump for personal events, data regarding retrieval distributions for public events have been equivocal. The primary aim of the present study was to address life-span retrieval distributions of different types of public events in comparison to personal events, and to test whether the existing accounts of the bump can explain the distribution of public events. We asked a large national sample to report the most important, happiest, and saddest personal events and the most important, happiest, saddest, most proud, most fearful, and most shameful public events. We found a robust bump corresponding to the third decade of life for the happiest and the most important positive but not for the saddest and most important negative personal events. For the most important public events, a bump emerged only for the two most frequently mentioned events. Distributions of public events cued with emotions were marked by recency. These results point to potential differences in retrieval of important personal and public events. While the life-script framework well accounts for the findings regarding important personal events, a chronologically retroactive search seem to guide retrieval of public events. Reminiscence bump observed for the two public events suggest that age-at-event affects recall of public events to the degree that the events are high-impact ones that dominate nation's collective memory. Results provide further evidence that the bump is not unitary and points to importance of event type and memory elicitation method with regard to competing explanations of the phenomenon.
尽管有大量证据表明个人事件存在可靠的记忆隆起现象,但关于公共事件检索分布的数据一直存在争议。本研究的主要目的是比较不同类型公共事件与个人事件的终生检索分布,并测试现有的隆起现象解释是否能说明公共事件的分布情况。我们要求一个全国性的大样本报告最重要、最开心和最悲伤的个人事件,以及最重要、最开心、最悲伤、最自豪、最恐惧和最羞耻的公共事件。我们发现,对于最开心和最重要的积极个人事件,在生命的第三个十年出现了明显的隆起,但最悲伤和最重要的消极个人事件则没有。对于最重要的公共事件,只有两个最常被提及的事件出现了隆起。由情感引发的公共事件分布以近期性为特征。这些结果表明,重要的个人事件和公共事件在检索方面可能存在差异。虽然生命脚本框架很好地解释了关于重要个人事件的研究结果,但按时间顺序进行的追溯性搜索似乎指导着公共事件的检索。对这两个公共事件观察到的记忆隆起表明,事件发生时的年龄会影响对公共事件的回忆,前提是这些事件是对国家集体记忆有重大影响的事件。研究结果进一步证明,记忆隆起并非单一现象,并指出了事件类型和记忆引发方法在该现象的各种竞争性解释中的重要性。