Williams K A, Bryant T A, Taillon L A
Department of Medicine (Cardiology), The University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
J Nucl Med. 1998 Nov;39(11):1857-61.
First-pass radionuclide angiographic (FPRNA) analysis, using the standard, single-fixed region of interest (ROI) drawn at end-diastole, often underestimates the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as determined by other standard techniques. This study examined the hypothesis that correction for the anatomic motion of the aortic valve plane toward the apex during systole, which results in improper inclusion of aortic counts within the single-fixed ROI, using a two-ROI method to compensate for this motion would eliminate this underestimation.
In 70 patients who underwent FPRNA and planar gated equilibrium radionuclide angiography (GERNA) on the same day, Fourier transform phase and amplitude images were used to generate functional maps of the aorta and the left ventricle on the FPRNA representative cycle. The region of low amplitude between the aorta and left ventricle, which corresponds to the degree of aortic valve plane motion, was used to guide the manual placement of two ROIs. The first was over the left ventricle at the end-diastole including the aortic valve plane area, and the second was a smaller end-systolic ROI drawn over the first ROI, excluding the valve plane area.
Both the fixed- and dual-ROI FPRNA methods had excellent correlation with GERNA (r = 0.92 and 0.91, respectively). The mean FPRNA LVEF using a fixed ROI (45% +/- 14%) was significantly lower than GERNA (51% +/- 15%, p < 0.001), but the mean LVEF calculated from the dual-ROI (51% +/- 14%) was essentially identical to those obtained with GERNA. The method of manual placement of the two ROIs had extremely high levels of inter- and intraobserver reproducibility (r = 0.98 and 0.99, respectively).
Despite good correlation, the standard, fixed-ROI method of FPRNA analysis systematically underestimates the LVEFs of GERNA. This problem can be eliminated by taking into account valve plane motion during the cardiac cycle by using Fourier-guided, dual-ROI analysis on FPRNA. These differences in methods and results should be considered when substituting or comparing LVEFs derived from these techniques.
首次通过放射性核素血管造影(FPRNA)分析,使用在舒张末期绘制的标准单固定感兴趣区(ROI),通常会低估由其他标准技术测定的左心室射血分数(LVEF)。本研究检验了这样一个假设:通过使用双ROI方法来补偿收缩期主动脉瓣平面朝向心尖的解剖运动(这会导致单固定ROI内不恰当地纳入主动脉计数),可以消除这种低估。
在70例同一天接受FPRNA和平面门控平衡放射性核素血管造影(GERNA)的患者中,利用傅里叶变换相位和幅度图像在FPRNA代表性周期上生成主动脉和左心室的功能图。主动脉和左心室之间低幅度区域对应于主动脉瓣平面运动程度,用于指导两个ROI的手动放置。第一个ROI在舒张末期覆盖左心室,包括主动脉瓣平面区域,第二个是在第一个ROI上绘制的较小的收缩末期ROI,不包括瓣膜平面区域。
固定ROI和双ROI的FPRNA方法与GERNA均具有良好的相关性(分别为r = 0.92和0.91)。使用固定ROI的FPRNA平均LVEF(45%±14%)显著低于GERNA(51%±15%,p < 0.001),但双ROI计算的平均LVEF(51%±14%)与GERNA获得的基本相同。两个ROI的手动放置方法在观察者间和观察者内具有极高的可重复性(分别为r = 0.98和0.99)。
尽管相关性良好,但FPRNA分析的标准固定ROI方法系统性地低估了GERNA的LVEF。通过在FPRNA上使用傅里叶引导的双ROI分析考虑心动周期中的瓣膜平面运动,可以消除这个问题。在替代或比较源自这些技术的LVEF时,应考虑方法和结果的这些差异。