Duckett S J
La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC.
Med J Aust. 1998 Oct 19;169(S1):S17-21. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb123470.x.
Casemix funding was introduced first in Victoria in 1993-94, and since then most States have moved towards either casemix funding or using casemix to inform the budget setting process. The five States implementing casemix have adopted some common funding elements: all use AN-DRG-3; all have introduced capping, msot commonly at the hospital level; and all ensure accuracy of diagnosis and procedure coding through coding audits. Two funding models have been developed. The fixed and variable model involves a fixed grant for hospital overhead costs and a payment for each patient treated, covering only variable costs. The integrated model provides an integrated payment to hospitals for each patient treated, covering both the fixed and variable costs. There are different weight setting processes and base prices between the States, which result in marked differences in the price paid for the same type of case treated in similar hospitals. Learning across State boundaries should be encouraged, with knowledge of what is effective and what is ineffective in casemix funding arrangements being used to develop Australian best practice in this area.
病例组合资金于1993 - 1994年在维多利亚州首次引入,自那时起,大多数州已朝着病例组合资金模式发展,或利用病例组合为预算制定过程提供信息。实施病例组合的五个州采用了一些共同的资金要素:都使用AN - DRG - 3;都引入了限额,最常见的是在医院层面;并且都通过编码审计确保诊断和程序编码的准确性。已经开发了两种资金模式。固定和可变模式包括一笔用于医院间接费用的固定拨款以及对每位接受治疗的患者的支付,仅涵盖可变成本。综合模式为每位接受治疗的患者向医院提供综合支付,涵盖固定成本和可变成本。各州之间存在不同的权重设定过程和基准价格,这导致在类似医院治疗相同类型病例所支付的价格存在显著差异。应鼓励跨州学习,利用病例组合资金安排中有效和无效的知识来制定澳大利亚在这一领域的最佳实践。