Willcox Sharon
Victorian Department of Human Services, 555 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000 Australia; and La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2005 Mar 31;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1743-8462-2-6.
Since 1995 Australian health insurers have been able to purchase health services pro-actively through negotiating contracts with hospitals, but little is known about their experience of purchasing. This paper examines the current status of purchasing through interviews with senior managers representing all Australian private health insurers. Many of the traditional tools used to generate competition and enhance efficiency (such as selective contracting and co-payments) have had limited use due to public and political opposition. Adoption of bundled case payment models using diagnosis related groups (DRGs) has been slow. Insurers cite multiple reasons including poor understanding of private hospital costs, unfamiliarity with DRGs, resistance from the medical profession and concerns about premature discharge. Innovation in payment models has been limited, although some insurers are considering introduction of volume-outcome purchasing and pay for performance incentives. Private health insurers also face a complex web of regulation, some of which appears to impede moves towards more efficient purchasing.
自1995年以来,澳大利亚的健康保险公司就能够通过与医院谈判合同来主动购买健康服务,但对于它们的购买经验却知之甚少。本文通过采访代表所有澳大利亚私人健康保险公司的高级管理人员来考察购买的现状。许多用于产生竞争和提高效率的传统工具(如选择性合同和共付额)由于公众和政治上的反对而使用有限。采用基于诊断相关分组(DRG)的捆绑式病例支付模式进展缓慢。保险公司列举了多个原因,包括对私立医院成本了解不足、对DRG不熟悉、医疗行业的抵制以及对过早出院的担忧。支付模式的创新有限,尽管一些保险公司正在考虑引入基于数量-结果的购买方式和绩效支付激励措施。私人健康保险公司还面临着复杂的监管网络,其中一些监管似乎阻碍了向更高效购买方式的转变。