• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对床边交接班的看法。

Patient's perceptions of bedside handovers.

作者信息

Cahill J

机构信息

University of Hertfordshire, Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Hatfield, Herts.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 1998 Jul;7(4):351-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00149.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00149.x
PMID:9830976
Abstract

The bedside handover is a universal phenomenon in nearly every type of care setting. It has become the chief arena for the intershift handover in contemporary nursing practice. Published literature investigating patients' viewpoints on the location of the bedside handover is sparse. The overall aim of this study is to describe and provide an analysis of patients' perceptions of the bedside handover. A grounded theory approach to data collection and data analysis was employed to capture surgical patients' views about the bedside handover. The analysis tentatively suggests the existence of three categories that describe the patients' perceptions of the bedside handover. 'Maintaining a Professional Distance', 'Establishing Professional Sharing' and 'Maintaining Patient Safety.'

摘要

床边交接班在几乎每一种护理环境中都是一种普遍现象。它已成为当代护理实践中班次交接的主要场所。关于患者对床边交接班地点看法的已发表文献很少。本研究的总体目标是描述并分析患者对床边交接班的看法。采用扎根理论方法进行数据收集和数据分析,以了解外科患者对床边交接班的看法。分析初步表明存在三类描述患者对床边交接班看法的类别,即“保持专业距离”、“建立专业分享”和“维护患者安全”。

相似文献

1
Patient's perceptions of bedside handovers.患者对床边交接班的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 1998 Jul;7(4):351-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00149.x.
2
Patients' perceptions of bedside handover.
Nurs Stand. 1999;14(12):32-5. doi: 10.7748/ns1999.12.14.12.32.c2726.
3
Nurse perceptions of person-centered handovers in the oncological inpatient setting: A qualitative study.护士对肿瘤住院患者环境中以患者为中心的交接班的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Oct;86:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
4
Improving the nursing handover report.
Prof Nurse. 1997 Jun;12(9):637-9.
5
Nurse shift report: who says you can't talk in front of the patient?护士交班报告:谁说你不能在患者面前交谈?
Nurs Adm Q. 2006 Apr-Jun;30(2):112-22. doi: 10.1097/00006216-200604000-00008.
6
Ensuring continuing care: styles and efficiency of the handover process.
Aust J Adv Nurs. 1998 Sep-Nov;16(1):23-7.
7
Bedside handover: quality improvement strategy to "transform care at the bedside".床边交接班:“转变床边护理”的质量改进策略
J Nurs Care Qual. 2009 Apr-Jun;24(2):136-42. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000347450.90676.d9.
8
Bedside nursing handover: a case study.床边护理交接班:一项案例研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):27-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2009.01809.x.
9
A qualitative study of shift handover practice and function from a socio-technical perspective.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jan;37(2):125-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02066.x.
10
Introducing bedside handover reports.介绍床边交接班报告。
Prof Nurse. 1997 Jan;12(4):270-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perceptions of outcomes used to evaluate in-hospital handover interventions: a rapid review of qualitative data.用于评估住院期间交接班干预措施的患者对结果的认知:定性数据的快速回顾
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 8;15(8):e100883. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100883.
2
Observations of nursing staff compliance to a checklist for person-centred handovers - a quality improvement project.护理人员对以患者为中心的交接班检查表的依从性观察——一项质量改进项目。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Dec;33(4):892-901. doi: 10.1111/scs.12686. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
3
Need for a hands-on approach to hand-offs: A study of nursing handovers in an Indian Neurosciences Center.
采用实际操作方法进行交接班的必要性:对印度神经科学中心护理交接班的一项研究。
Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan-Mar;11(1):54-9. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.165776.
4
Patient and nurse preferences for nurse handover-using preferences to inform policy: a discrete choice experiment protocol.患者和护士对护士交接班的偏好——运用偏好为政策提供信息:一项离散选择实验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 11;5(11):e008941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008941.