Akiyoshi H, Gonda T, Terada T
Second Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Japan.
Liver. 1998 Oct;18(5):352-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0676.1998.tb00817.x.
AIMS/BACKGROUND: The mammalian liver receives both sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves that contain aminergic, cholinergic and peptidergic components. The intrahepatic distribution of nerve fibers are highly species-dependent; and also, even within one species, there are notable variations. To reveal the pattern and type of hepatic innervation in different species, we examined the distribution and density of these nerve fibers.
The livers of rats, golden hamsters, guinea pigs, dogs and humans were used. Aminergic and peptidergic nerve fibers were identified by immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), neuropeptide Y (NPY), substance P (SP), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and galanin (GAL), and cholinergic fibers were identified by the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) neurohistochemistry method.
AChE-, TH-, NPY-, CGRP-, VIP-, and SP-positive nerves were observed in the connective tissue of the portal region, and they were in close contact with hepatic arteries, portal veins and bile ducts in all five species. Within the parenchyma of guinea pig, dog and human livers, TH-, NPY- and SP-positive fibers were observed, but no AChE- and CGRP-positive fibers were observed. In rat and hamster livers, no parenchymal nerve fibers could be demonstrated, but CGRP-, NPY- and SP-positive fibers were observed in the border of periportal areas. The density of CGRP-positive nerve fibers were slightly higher around bile ducts than around hepatic arteries and portal veins. GAL-positive fibers were not detected in any animal.
These data indicate that there were differences in the patterns of hepatic innervation among rats, golden hamsters, guinea pigs, dogs and humans. The data also show that: 1) in rat and hamster livers, hepatic functions may be regulated by both sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves in the portal region; 2) in guinea pig, dog and human livers they may be regulated by these fibers both in the interlobular region (parasympathetic and sympathetic systems) and in the intraparenchymal region (sympathetic system); and thus, 3) in the latter three species, hepatocytes and sinusoidal cells may be innervated by sympathetic nerves.
目的/背景:哺乳动物肝脏接受含有胺能、胆碱能和肽能成分的交感神经和副交感神经支配。肝内神经纤维的分布具有高度的物种依赖性;而且,即使在同一物种内,也存在显著差异。为了揭示不同物种肝脏神经支配的模式和类型,我们研究了这些神经纤维的分布和密度。
使用大鼠、金黄仓鼠、豚鼠、狗和人类的肝脏。通过免疫组织化学法检测酪氨酸羟化酶(TH)、神经肽Y(NPY)、P物质(SP)、血管活性肠肽(VIP)、降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)和甘丙肽(GAL)来鉴定胺能和肽能神经纤维,通过乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)神经组织化学方法鉴定胆碱能纤维。
在所有五个物种的门管区结缔组织中均观察到AChE、TH、NPY、CGRP、VIP和SP阳性神经,它们与肝动脉、门静脉和胆管紧密接触。在豚鼠、狗和人类肝脏实质内,观察到TH、NPY和SP阳性纤维,但未观察到AChE和CGRP阳性纤维。在大鼠和仓鼠肝脏中,未发现实质神经纤维,但在门周区边界观察到CGRP、NPY和SP阳性纤维。胆管周围CGRP阳性神经纤维的密度略高于肝动脉和门静脉周围。在任何动物中均未检测到GAL阳性纤维。
这些数据表明大鼠、金黄仓鼠、豚鼠、狗和人类的肝脏神经支配模式存在差异。数据还显示:1)在大鼠和仓鼠肝脏中,肝功能可能受门管区交感神经和副交感神经的共同调节;2)在豚鼠、狗和人类肝脏中,肝功能可能受小叶间区域(副交感神经系统和交感神经系统)和实质内区域(交感神经系统)的这些纤维的调节;因此,3)在后三个物种中,肝细胞和窦状隙细胞可能受交感神经支配。