• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Identification accuracy of children versus adults: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pozzulo J D, Lindsay R C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 1998 Oct;22(5):549-70. doi: 10.1023/a:1025739514042.

DOI:10.1023/a:1025739514042
PMID:9833566
Abstract

Identification accuracy of children and adults was examined in a meta-analysis. Preschoolers (M = 4 years) were less likely than adults to make correct identifications. Children over the age of 5 did not differ significantly from adults with regard to correct identification rate. Children of all ages examined were less likely than adults to correctly reject a target-absent lineup. Even adolescents (M = 12-13 years) did not reach an adult rate of correct rejection. Compared to simultaneous lineup presentation, sequential lineups increased the child-adult gap for correct rejections. Providing child witnesses with identification practice or training did not increase their correct rejection rates. Suggestions for children's inability to correctly reject target-absent lineups are discussed. Future directions for identification research are presented.

摘要

相似文献

1
Identification accuracy of children versus adults: a meta-analysis.
Law Hum Behav. 1998 Oct;22(5):549-70. doi: 10.1023/a:1025739514042.
2
Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.跨生命周期的目击证人识别:年龄差异的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;141(6):1228-65. doi: 10.1037/bul0000013. Epub 2015 May 25.
3
Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.警方辨认嫌疑犯时目击者的准确率:荟萃分析比较。
Law Hum Behav. 2003 Oct;27(5):523-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1025438223608.
4
Lineup identification by children: effects of clothing bias.儿童进行列队辨认:服装偏差的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Jun;28(3):339-54. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000029142.00834.e3.
5
Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards.探讨年龄和延迟对儿童人物识别的影响:口头描述、阵容表现以及万能卡片的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2011 May;102(2):161-83. doi: 10.1348/000712610X507902. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
6
Biased lineups: sequential presentation reduces the problem.
J Appl Psychol. 1991 Dec;76(6):796-802. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.796.
7
Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.顺序呈现辨认和目击证人准确性。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Aug;35(4):262-74. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9236-2.
8
Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.儿童从列队辨认面孔:列队展示及指示对准确性的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Sep;91(5):1102-13. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1102.
9
Children's metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task.儿童在目击证人识别任务中的元认知判断。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Aug;97(4):286-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 May 21.
10
Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.提高阵容识别准确性:两个编码优于一个。
J Appl Psychol. 1989 Oct;74(5):706-13. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.706.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflector variables in augmented reality lineups: Assessing eyewitness identification reliability in children and adults with confidence, response time, and proximity to the lineup.增强现实辨认列队中的反射变量:利用信心、反应时间和与列队的接近程度评估儿童和成人目击证人辨认的可靠性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 18;19(9):e0308757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308757. eCollection 2024.
2
The role of experimenter familiarity in children's eyewitness identification.实验者熟悉程度在儿童目击证人辨认中的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 26;31(2):147-160. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175071. eCollection 2024.
3
Child witness expressions of certainty are informative.
儿童证人表达的肯定意见是有信息价值的。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Nov;150(11):2387-2407. doi: 10.1037/xge0001049. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
A preliminary investigation on the performance of brain-injured witnesses on target-absent line-up procedures.脑损伤证人在无目标列队辨认程序中的表现的初步调查。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Oct 9;26(3):480-495. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1507847. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparing Younger and Older Adult Eyewitnesses: Examining the Simultaneous, Elimination, and Wildcard Lineup Procedures.比较年轻和年长成年目击者:审视同时呈现、排除式和 wildcard 列队辨认程序。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Sep 3;25(1):106-123. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1364614. eCollection 2018.
6
Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults.列队辨认表现的发展趋势:青少年比儿童和成年人更容易误认无辜的旁观者。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):428-440. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6.
7
Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries.在列队辨认过程中为儿童证人提供支持:探究注册中介的有效性。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;32(3):367-375. doi: 10.1002/acp.3412. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
8
The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: a critical review and future directions.面部识别障碍的康复:批判性回顾与未来方向。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 23;8:491. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00491. eCollection 2014.
9
Judgments of others' heights are biased toward the height of the perceiver.对他人身高的判断会偏向于感知者自身的身高。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):566-71. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0689-z.
10
Verbal overshadowing of face memory does occur in children too!言语对人脸记忆的掩蔽作用也会发生在儿童身上!
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 24;4:970. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00970. eCollection 2013.