Bouw M R, Hammarlund-Udenaes M
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
Pharm Res. 1998 Nov;15(11):1673-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1011992125204.
To investigate the performance of two alternative retrodialysis recovery methods and to describe the influence of different recoveries on the reliability in estimating unbound extracellular concentrations of morphine.
Unbound concentrations of morphine in striatum and in blood were determined by microdialysis after a 10 min i.v. infusion in freely moving rats. In vivo recovery of morphine was determined by morphine itself, retrodialysis by drug, and by the calibrator nalorphine, retrodialysis by calibrator.
The low calibrator recovery in striatum (8.6%) resulted in large variability in the estimation of unbound extracellular concentrations when retrodialysis by calibrator was used. In blood, where the recovery was higher (36%), the variability was smaller. Also, when retrodialysis by drug was used, the variability remained low. This difference is caused by the propagation of errors in the way retrodialysis recovery is determined. Therefore, calibrator recovery values > or =20% are preferable in concentration estimations using retrodialysis by calibrator.
When no time-dependent change in recovery is observed, retrodialysis by drug determined before the systemic administration is the best method. The calibrator is valuable as a quality control during the experiment.
研究两种替代性反渗析回收方法的性能,并描述不同回收率对估计吗啡未结合细胞外浓度可靠性的影响。
在自由活动的大鼠中静脉输注10分钟后,通过微透析测定纹状体和血液中吗啡的未结合浓度。吗啡的体内回收率通过吗啡自身、药物反渗析以及校准剂纳洛酮、校准剂反渗析来确定。
当使用校准剂反渗析时,纹状体中校准剂的低回收率(8.6%)导致未结合细胞外浓度估计值的较大变异性。在回收率较高(36%)的血液中,变异性较小。同样,当使用药物反渗析时,变异性仍然较低。这种差异是由反渗析回收率测定方式中的误差传播引起的。因此,在使用校准剂反渗析进行浓度估计时,校准剂回收率值≥20%更可取。
当未观察到回收率随时间的变化时,在全身给药前测定的药物反渗析是最佳方法。校准剂在实验过程中作为质量控制很有价值。