Hirai N, Tatsumi N, Hino M, Yamane T, Ohta K
Department of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine, Osaka City University Medical School, Japan.
Osaka City Med J. 1998 Jun;44(1):55-71.
In order to investigate the inter-laboratory differences of coagulation assays, three different control plasmas were distributed for coagulation assays to 162 institutes. Three types of coagulation tests, that is, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and fibrinogen (Fbg) assay were carried out by routine methods in each institute. In our laboratory, the Fbg concentrations were measured in two different plasmas using one instrument and nine reagents, and the Fbg concentrations were measured in ten control plasmas using three instruments and one reagent. Results were obtained as follows: (1) The coefficient of variance (CV) for control plasma with the highest value was significant in the PT assay and APTT assay. (2) Inter and intra-institute differences in PT and APTT assays were observed when the reagent or the instrument used was changed. (3) Inter and intra-institute differences in PT and APTT assays were also observed when both the reagent and the instrument were changed. (4) Inter and intra-institute differences in the PT and APTT assays were observed between the manual and the mechanical methods. (5) The CVs for the Fbg assays were the largest in the plasma at the lowest concentration of the three plasmas. (6) When control plasmas of three different Fbg concentrations were assayed, the number of the institutes which obtained a value greater than 3 standard deviations (SDs) was highest for the control plasma with the lowest concentrations of Fbg, and some of the instruments were not able to measure such a low Fbg concentration. (7) When the fibrinogen concentration was measured in various kinds of commercially-available control plasmas with a calibrated instrument, the values determined were different from the assigned ones and varied significantly from instrument to instrument. From the results, we concluded that standardization of the quality of control plasma, and its value assignment to the plasma should be established as soon as possible, and that a reliable standard fibrinogen assay should be developed.
为了研究凝血检测的实验室间差异,向162家机构分发了三种不同的对照血浆用于凝血检测。各机构采用常规方法进行三种类型的凝血检测,即凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)和纤维蛋白原(Fbg)检测。在我们实验室,使用一台仪器和九种试剂在两种不同血浆中检测Fbg浓度,使用三台仪器和一种试剂在十种对照血浆中检测Fbg浓度。结果如下:(1)在PT检测和APTT检测中,最高值对照血浆的变异系数(CV)显著。(2)当更换试剂或仪器时,观察到PT和APTT检测中的机构间和机构内差异。(3)当同时更换试剂和仪器时,也观察到PT和APTT检测中的机构间和机构内差异。(4)在手工方法和机械方法之间观察到PT和APTT检测中的机构间和机构内差异。(5)在三种血浆中浓度最低的血浆中,Fbg检测的CV最大。(6)当检测三种不同Fbg浓度的对照血浆时,Fbg浓度最低的对照血浆获得大于3个标准差(SDs)值的机构数量最多,并且一些仪器无法检测到如此低的Fbg浓度。(7)当使用校准仪器在各种市售对照血浆中测量纤维蛋白原浓度时,测定值与指定值不同,并且仪器之间差异显著。从结果来看,我们得出结论,应尽快建立对照血浆质量的标准化及其血浆赋值,并且应开发可靠的标准纤维蛋白原检测方法。