• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于重度饮酒的五题问卷。

Five-shot questionnaire on heavy drinking.

作者信息

Seppä K, Lepistö J, Sillanaukee P

机构信息

University of Tampere, Medical School, and Tampere University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Nov;22(8):1788-91.

PMID:9835296
Abstract

To develop an effective, but short, questionnaire to detect heavy drinking, we combined two questions from AUDIT and three from CAGE. We have tested earlier this new Five-Shot questionnaire among male alcoholics who all had a total score of at least 4/7. The purpose of the present study was to find out the effectiveness of the Five-Shot questionnaire among middle-aged men. In the present study, the Five-Shot questionnaire was distributed to all (n = 853) 40-year-old men attending health screening in a Finnish town. The participation percentage in the screening was 70.3%. Self-reported alcohol consumption was used as a gold standard; 557 of these men gave a self-report that they consumed less absolute alcohol than 140 g/week (moderate drinkers), and 70 reported consuming > or = 280 g/week (heavy drinkers). None of the individual Five-Shot questions was superior to any other in detecting heavy drinkers. The cut-off point > or = 3 for Five-Shot gave a 77% sensitivity in detecting heavy drinkers, with a specificity of 83% and an overall accuracy of 83%. The corresponding figures with > or = 2.5 cut-off were 96%, 76%, and 78%. The commonly used cut-off for CAGE, > or = 2, gave a result of 47%, 87%, and 83%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the CAGE was clearly worse, compared with that of the Five-Shot. The new Five-Shot questionnaire seems to be efficient in differentiating between moderate and heavy drinkers. It is also easy and fast for physicians to use in different health-care settings. Thus, it can serve as a good aid in early detection of heavy drinking.

摘要

为开发一份有效但简短的用于检测酗酒情况的问卷,我们将酒精使用障碍鉴定测试(AUDIT)中的两个问题与密歇根酒精筛查测试(CAGE)中的三个问题相结合。我们之前已在所有总分至少为4/7的男性酗酒者中对这份新的五问题问卷进行了测试。本研究的目的是探究该五问题问卷在中年男性中的有效性。在本研究中,这份五问题问卷被分发给芬兰一个城镇参加健康筛查的所有(n = 853)40岁男性。筛查的参与率为70.3%。自我报告的酒精摄入量被用作金标准;这些男性中有557人自我报告每周饮用的纯酒精量少于140克(适度饮酒者),70人报告每周饮用≥280克(酗酒者)。在检测酗酒者方面,五问题问卷中的任何一个单独问题都不比其他问题更具优势。五问题问卷≥3的临界值在检测酗酒者时的灵敏度为77%,特异度为83%,总体准确率为83%。≥2.5临界值时的相应数据分别为96%、76%和78%。CAGE常用的临界值≥2时的结果分别为47%、87%和83%。与五问题问卷相比,CAGE的受试者工作特征曲线下面积明显更差。新的五问题问卷似乎在区分适度饮酒者和酗酒者方面很有效。医生在不同的医疗环境中使用也很简便快捷。因此,它可作为早期检测酗酒的良好辅助工具。

相似文献

1
Five-shot questionnaire on heavy drinking.关于重度饮酒的五题问卷。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998 Nov;22(8):1788-91.
2
Binge drinking and its detection among middle-aged men using AUDIT, AUDIT-C and AUDIT-3.使用酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)、AUDIT-C和AUDIT-3对中年男性进行暴饮及其检测
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 May;26(3):295-9. doi: 10.1080/09595230701247756.
3
Effectiveness of structured questionnaires for screening heavy drinking in middle-aged women.结构化问卷用于筛查中年女性重度饮酒情况的有效性。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006 Nov;30(11):1884-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00233.x.
4
The value of CAGE, CUGE, and AUDIT in screening for alcohol abuse and dependence among college freshmen.CAGE、CUGE和AUDIT在筛查大学新生酒精滥用和酒精依赖方面的价值。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2000 Jan;24(1):53-7.
5
Screening properties of questionnaires and laboratory tests for the detection of alcohol abuse or dependence in a general practice population.在普通门诊人群中检测酒精滥用或依赖的问卷及实验室检查的筛查特性。
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Mar;51(464):206-17.
6
AUDIT and its abbreviated versions in detecting heavy and binge drinking in a general population survey.在一项普通人群调查中,AUDIT及其缩写版本在检测重度饮酒和暴饮方面的应用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jul 1;103(1-2):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
7
Identification of heavy drinkers by using the early detection of alcohol consumption score.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001 Feb;25(2):228-35.
8
Screening for problem drinking: comparison of CAGE and AUDIT. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.问题饮酒筛查:CAGE与酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)的比较。门诊护理质量改进项目(ACQUIP)。酒精使用障碍识别测试。
J Gen Intern Med. 1998 Jun;13(6):379-88. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00118.x.
9
The relationship between self-reported alcohol intake and the morbidities managed by GPs in Australia.澳大利亚自我报告的酒精摄入量与全科医生管理的疾病之间的关系。
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Mar 14;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-17.
10
Can screening and simple written advice reduce excessive alcohol consumption among emergency care patients?筛查和简单的书面建议能否减少急诊患者的过量饮酒行为?
Alcohol Alcohol. 2005 Sep-Oct;40(5):401-8. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh175. Epub 2005 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of an application for the self-assessment of lifestyle behaviour in cardiac patients.心脏病患者生活方式行为自我评估应用程序的评估
Neth Heart J. 2024 Jan;32(1):55-62. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01835-7. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Sensitivity to Experiencing Alcohol Hangovers: Reconsideration of the 0.11% Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) Threshold for Having a Hangover.对酒精宿醉体验的敏感性:对0.11%血液酒精浓度(BAC)宿醉阈值的重新考量。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 9;9(1):179. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010179.
3
The Association between Alcohol Hangover Frequency and Severity: Evidence for Reverse Tolerance?
酒精宿醉频率与严重程度之间的关联:反向耐受的证据?
J Clin Med. 2019 Sep 21;8(10):1520. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101520.
4
Validation and proposal for cut-off values of an abbreviated version of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test using the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.使用韩国国家健康与营养检查调查对酒精使用障碍识别测试简版的临界值进行验证及提出建议
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;5(2):113-119. doi: 10.15441/ceem.17.228. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Training Working Memory in Adolescents Using Serious Game Elements: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.使用严肃游戏元素训练青少年工作记忆:初步随机对照试验
JMIR Serious Games. 2018 May 23;6(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/games.8364.
6
Study protocol for a non-inferiority trial of a blended smoking cessation treatment versus face-to-face treatment (LiveSmokefree-Study).混合戒烟治疗与面对面治疗的非劣效性试验研究方案(无烟生活研究)
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):1187. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3851-x.
7
Evaluating the effect of a web-based quality improvement system with feedback and outreach visits on guideline concordance in the field of cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and study protocol.评估基于网络的质量改进系统(包含反馈和外展访问)对心脏康复领域指南一致性的影响:理论依据与研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Dec 31;9:780. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0131-y.
8
Readability of self-report alcohol misuse measures.自我报告酒精滥用测量方法的可读性。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Mar;75(2):328-34. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.328.
9
Alcohol screening and brief intervention among drug users in primary care: a discussion paper.在初级保健中对吸毒者进行酒精筛查和简短干预:讨论文件。
Ir J Med Sci. 2012 Jun;181(2):165-70. doi: 10.1007/s11845-011-0748-7. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
10
Improving guideline adherence for cardiac rehabilitation in the Netherlands.提高荷兰心脏康复指南的依从性。
Neth Heart J. 2011 Jun;19(6):285-9. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0104-6.