Ali J, Adam R, Josa D, Pierre I, Bedsaysie H, West U, Winn J, Ali E, Haynes B
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
World J Surg. 1998 Dec;22(12):1192-6. doi: 10.1007/s002689900543.
We tested the effectiveness of a basic prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) program by assessing cognitive performance and trauma management skills among prehospital trauma personnel. Fourteen subjects who completed a standard PHTLS course (group I) were compared to a matched group not completing a PHTLS program (group II). Cognitive performance was assessed on 50-item multiple choice examinations, and trauma skills management was assessed with four simulated trauma patients. Pre-PHTLS multiple choice questionnaire scores were similar (45.8 +/- 9.4% vs. 48.8 +/- 8.9% for groups I and II, respectively), but the post-PHTLS scores were higher in group I (80.4 +/- 5.9%) than in group II (52.6 +/- 4.9%). Pre-PHTLS simulated trauma patient performance scores (standardized to a maximum total of 20 for each station) were similar at all four stations for both groups, ranging from 7.9 to 10.4. The post-PHTLS scores were statistically significantly higher at all four stations for group I (range 16.0-19.0) compared to those for group II (range 8.0-11.1). The overall mean pre-PHTLS score for all four stations was 8.3 +/- 2.1 for group I and 8.8 +/- 2.0 (NS) for group II; the group I post-PHTLS mean score for the four stations was 17.1 +/- 2.7 (p < 0.05) compared to 9.1 +/- 2.3 for group II. Pre-PHTLS Adherence to Priority scores on a scale of 1 to 7 were similar (1.1 +/- 0.9 for group I and 1.2 +/- 1.0 for group II). Post-PHTLS group I Priority scores increased to 5.9 +/- 1.1. Group II (1.1 +/- 1.0) did not improve their post-PHTLS scores. The pre-PHTLS Organized Approach scores in the simulated trauma patients on a scale of 1 to 5 were 2.1 +/- 1.0 for group I and 1.9 +/- 1.2 for group II (NS) compared to 4.2 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.05) in group I and 2.0 +/- 0.8 in group II after PHTLS. This study demonstrates improved cognitive and trauma management skills performance among prehospital paramedical personnel who complete the basic PHTLS program.
我们通过评估院前创伤急救人员的认知表现和创伤管理技能,测试了一项基本的院前创伤生命支持(PHTLS)计划的有效性。将完成标准PHTLS课程的14名受试者(第一组)与未完成PHTLS计划的匹配组(第二组)进行比较。通过50道多项选择题考试评估认知表现,并通过4名模拟创伤患者评估创伤技能管理。PHTLS课程前的多项选择题问卷得分相似(第一组和第二组分别为45.8±9.4%和48.8±8.9%),但第一组PHTLS课程后的得分(80.4±5.9%)高于第二组(52.6±4.9%)。两组在所有四个站点的PHTLS课程前模拟创伤患者表现得分(每个站点标准化最高总分为20分)相似,范围为7.9至10.4。与第二组(范围8.0 - 11.1)相比,第一组在所有四个站点的PHTLS课程后得分在统计学上显著更高(范围16.0 - 19.0)。所有四个站点的PHTLS课程前总体平均得分,第一组为8.3±2.1,第二组为8.8±2.0(无显著差异);第一组PHTLS课程后四个站点的平均得分是17.1±2.7(p < 0.05),而第二组为9.1±2.3。PHTLS课程前1至7分制的遵循优先级得分相似(第一组为1.1±0.9,第二组为1.2±1.0)。PHTLS课程后第一组的优先级得分提高到5.9±1.1。第二组(1.1±1.0)PHTLS课程后的得分没有提高。PHTLS课程前模拟创伤患者1至5分制的有条理方法得分,第一组为2.1±1.0,第二组为1.9±1.2(无显著差异),而PHTLS课程后第一组为4.2±0.9(p < 0.05),第二组为2.0±0.8。这项研究表明,完成基本PHTLS计划的院前医护人员的认知和创伤管理技能表现有所提高。