Suppr超能文献

院前创伤基础生命支持项目对认知及创伤管理技能的影响。

Effect of basic prehospital trauma life support program on cognitive and trauma management skills.

作者信息

Ali J, Adam R, Josa D, Pierre I, Bedsaysie H, West U, Winn J, Ali E, Haynes B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

World J Surg. 1998 Dec;22(12):1192-6. doi: 10.1007/s002689900543.

Abstract

We tested the effectiveness of a basic prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) program by assessing cognitive performance and trauma management skills among prehospital trauma personnel. Fourteen subjects who completed a standard PHTLS course (group I) were compared to a matched group not completing a PHTLS program (group II). Cognitive performance was assessed on 50-item multiple choice examinations, and trauma skills management was assessed with four simulated trauma patients. Pre-PHTLS multiple choice questionnaire scores were similar (45.8 +/- 9.4% vs. 48.8 +/- 8.9% for groups I and II, respectively), but the post-PHTLS scores were higher in group I (80.4 +/- 5.9%) than in group II (52.6 +/- 4.9%). Pre-PHTLS simulated trauma patient performance scores (standardized to a maximum total of 20 for each station) were similar at all four stations for both groups, ranging from 7.9 to 10.4. The post-PHTLS scores were statistically significantly higher at all four stations for group I (range 16.0-19.0) compared to those for group II (range 8.0-11.1). The overall mean pre-PHTLS score for all four stations was 8.3 +/- 2.1 for group I and 8.8 +/- 2.0 (NS) for group II; the group I post-PHTLS mean score for the four stations was 17.1 +/- 2.7 (p < 0.05) compared to 9.1 +/- 2.3 for group II. Pre-PHTLS Adherence to Priority scores on a scale of 1 to 7 were similar (1.1 +/- 0.9 for group I and 1.2 +/- 1.0 for group II). Post-PHTLS group I Priority scores increased to 5.9 +/- 1.1. Group II (1.1 +/- 1.0) did not improve their post-PHTLS scores. The pre-PHTLS Organized Approach scores in the simulated trauma patients on a scale of 1 to 5 were 2.1 +/- 1.0 for group I and 1.9 +/- 1.2 for group II (NS) compared to 4.2 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.05) in group I and 2.0 +/- 0.8 in group II after PHTLS. This study demonstrates improved cognitive and trauma management skills performance among prehospital paramedical personnel who complete the basic PHTLS program.

摘要

我们通过评估院前创伤急救人员的认知表现和创伤管理技能,测试了一项基本的院前创伤生命支持(PHTLS)计划的有效性。将完成标准PHTLS课程的14名受试者(第一组)与未完成PHTLS计划的匹配组(第二组)进行比较。通过50道多项选择题考试评估认知表现,并通过4名模拟创伤患者评估创伤技能管理。PHTLS课程前的多项选择题问卷得分相似(第一组和第二组分别为45.8±9.4%和48.8±8.9%),但第一组PHTLS课程后的得分(80.4±5.9%)高于第二组(52.6±4.9%)。两组在所有四个站点的PHTLS课程前模拟创伤患者表现得分(每个站点标准化最高总分为20分)相似,范围为7.9至10.4。与第二组(范围8.0 - 11.1)相比,第一组在所有四个站点的PHTLS课程后得分在统计学上显著更高(范围16.0 - 19.0)。所有四个站点的PHTLS课程前总体平均得分,第一组为8.3±2.1,第二组为8.8±2.0(无显著差异);第一组PHTLS课程后四个站点的平均得分是17.1±2.7(p < 0.05),而第二组为9.1±2.3。PHTLS课程前1至7分制的遵循优先级得分相似(第一组为1.1±0.9,第二组为1.2±1.0)。PHTLS课程后第一组的优先级得分提高到5.9±1.1。第二组(1.1±1.0)PHTLS课程后的得分没有提高。PHTLS课程前模拟创伤患者1至5分制的有条理方法得分,第一组为2.1±1.0,第二组为1.9±1.2(无显著差异),而PHTLS课程后第一组为4.2±0.9(p < 0.05),第二组为2.0±0.8。这项研究表明,完成基本PHTLS计划的院前医护人员的认知和创伤管理技能表现有所提高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验