• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种消化健康状况测量工具的开发:在初级保健人群中对量表假设、结构和信度的测试

Development of a digestive health status instrument: tests of scaling assumptions, structure and reliability in a primary care population.

作者信息

Shaw M, Talley N J, Adlis S, Beebe T, Tomshine P, Healey M

机构信息

Health Research Center, Park Nicollet Clinic, Institute for Research and Education, HealthSystem, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, USA.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Nov;12(11):1067-78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00399.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00399.x
PMID:9845396
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The absence of valid and reliable health status measures for functional gastrointestinal illness has limited research and patient care for this common group of disorders. A self-report survey has been developed.

METHODS

Initial development focused on extensive pre-testing of patients, primary care physicians and gastroenterologists. The disease-specific portion included the Rome criteria for dyspepsia subgroups and the Manning and Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. The Short Form-36 was added. Psychometric analyses included techniques of multitrait scaling, scale internal consistency and criterion validation.

RESULTS

Six hundred and ninety patients presenting to their primary care physician for treatment of heartburn, abdominal pain or discomfort completed the 98 question survey. The disease-specific portion revealed five components including reflux, dysmotility, a two-domain bowel dysfunction complex, and a pain index. Internal consistency measures demonstrated good to excellent reliability. Scaling successes were observed on multitrait scaling. The disease-specific portion was reduced to 34 questions. Criterion validity was demonstrated with the correlation of the disease-specific questions to the SF-36.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric analyses lend credence to the concept of stomach and bowel symptom subgrouping as proposed by expert consensus. The psychometric properties of the five summated disease-specific scales compare favourably with standardized health status measures.

摘要

背景

功能性胃肠病缺乏有效且可靠的健康状况测量方法,限制了对这一常见疾病群体的研究和患者护理。现已开发出一项自我报告调查。

方法

最初的开发重点是对患者、初级保健医生和胃肠病学家进行广泛的预测试。特定疾病部分包括消化不良亚组的罗马标准以及肠易激综合征的曼宁和罗马标准。增加了简短健康调查问卷(Short Form-36)。心理测量分析包括多特质量表技术、量表内部一致性和标准效度验证。

结果

690名因烧心、腹痛或不适前往初级保健医生处就诊的患者完成了这项包含98个问题的调查。特定疾病部分显示出五个组成部分,包括反流、动力障碍、双域肠道功能障碍复合体和疼痛指数。内部一致性测量显示出良好到极佳的可靠性。在多特质量表上观察到量表构建成功。特定疾病部分减少到34个问题。通过特定疾病问题与简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)的相关性证明了标准效度。

结论

心理测量分析支持了专家共识提出的胃肠症状亚组分类概念。五个合计的特定疾病量表的心理测量特性与标准化健康状况测量方法相比具有优势。

相似文献

1
Development of a digestive health status instrument: tests of scaling assumptions, structure and reliability in a primary care population.一种消化健康状况测量工具的开发:在初级保健人群中对量表假设、结构和信度的测试
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Nov;12(11):1067-78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00399.x.
2
Validation of a specific quality of life questionnaire for functional digestive disorders.功能性消化紊乱特定生活质量问卷的验证
Gut. 1999 Apr;44(4):527-33. doi: 10.1136/gut.44.4.527.
3
The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure.加州大学洛杉矶分校前列腺癌指数:一种与健康相关的生活质量测量方法的开发、可靠性和有效性
Med Care. 1998 Jul;36(7):1002-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199807000-00007.
4
Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.儿童复发性腹痛多维测量方法的开发:在三种环境下开展的基于人群的研究
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e210-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1412.
5
Development and psychometric evaluation of the patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptom severity index (PAGI-SYM) in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders.上消化道疾病患者上消化道症状严重程度指数(PAGI-SYM)的患者评估的开发与心理测量学评价
Qual Life Res. 2004 Dec;13(10):1737-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-9567-x.
6
Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in people who abuse heroin.对滥用海洛因者进行的SF-36健康调查的数据质量、缩放假设、信度和结构效度测试。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2014 Apr;113(4):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
[Psychometric validation of the Polish translation of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) Questionnaire in patients with reflux disease].[反流性疾病患者胃肠道症状评定量表(GSRS)波兰语翻译版及反流与消化不良生活质量(QOLRAD)问卷的心理测量学验证]
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2005 Mar;113(3):241-9.
8
Quality of life in persons with irritable bowel syndrome: development and validation of a new measure.肠易激综合征患者的生活质量:一种新测量方法的开发与验证
Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Feb;43(2):400-11. doi: 10.1023/a:1018831127942.
9
Reliability and validity of the digestive health status instrument in samples of community, primary care, and gastroenterology patients.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Jul;15(7):981-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.01026.x.
10
Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36.丹麦SF-36数据质量、量表假设及信度测试。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1001-11. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00092-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Amitriptyline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.阿米替林治疗肠易激综合征的疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2025 Jan 31;31(1):28-37. doi: 10.5056/jnm24084.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures in functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and COSMIN analysis.功能性消化不良的患者报告结局测量:系统评价和 COSMIN 分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02935-9.
3
Clostridium difficile Infection-Daily Symptoms (CDI-DaySyms™) questionnaire: psychometric characteristics and responder thresholds.
艰难梭菌感染-每日症状(CDI-DaySyms™)问卷:心理测量学特征和应答者阈值。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 May 3;17(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1142-9.
4
Patient-Centered Outcome Instruments in Esophageal and Gastric Surgery.食管和胃外科以患者为中心的结局指标
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Sep;21(9):1515-1522. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3451-9. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Irritable bowel syndrome: dietary interventions.肠易激综合征:饮食干预措施
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Jul 30;2015:0410.
6
Irritable bowel syndrome.肠易激综合征
BMJ Clin Evid. 2012 Jan 6;2012:0410.
7
Questionnaire based gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) assessment scales.基于问卷的胃食管反流病(GERD)评估量表。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;30(3):108-17. doi: 10.1007/s12664-011-0105-9. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
8
Irritable bowel syndrome.肠易激综合征
BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Jan 5;2010:0410.
9
A validation study of the Italian Short-Form Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire.意大利短版 Leeds 消化不良问卷的验证研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2010 Dec;5(6):501-6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-010-0467-5. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
10
Reliability and validity of the University of California, Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trial Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract Instrument.加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校硬皮病临床试验协会胃肠道仪器的可靠性和有效性。
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Sep 15;61(9):1257-63. doi: 10.1002/art.24730.