Suppr超能文献

血流感染患者接受适当经验性抗生素治疗的益处。

The benefit of appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment in patients with bloodstream infection.

作者信息

Leibovici L, Shraga I, Drucker M, Konigsberger H, Samra Z, Pitlik S D

机构信息

Department of Medicine E, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, Israel.

出版信息

J Intern Med. 1998 Nov;244(5):379-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1998.00379.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test whether empirical antibiotic treatment that matches the in vitro susceptibility of the pathogen (appropriate treatment) improves survival in patients with bloodstream infections; and to measure the improvement.

DESIGN

Observational, prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University hospital in Israel.

SUBJECTS

All patients with bloodstream infections detected during 1988-94.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In-hospital fatality rate and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

Out of 2158 patients given appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment, 436 (20%) died, compared with 432 of 1255 patients (34%) given inappropriate treatment (P = 0.0001). The median durations of hospital stay for patients who survived were 9 days for patients given appropriate treatment and 11 days for patients given inappropriate treatment. For patients who died, the median durations were 5 and 4 days, respectively (P < 0.05), for both comparisons. In a stratified analysis, fatality was higher in patients given inappropriate treatment than in those given appropriate treatment in all strata but two: patients with infections caused by streptococci other than Streptococcus gr. A and Streptoccocus pneumoniae (odds ratio (OR) of 1.0, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.4-2.5); and hypothermic patients (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.3-2.4). Even in patients with septic shock, inappropriate empirical treatment was associated with higher fatality rate (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.0-2.7). The highest benefit associated with appropriate treatment was observed in paediatric patients (OR = 5.1, 95% CI = 2.4-10.7); intra-abdominal infections (OR = 3.8, 95% CI = 2.0-7.1); infections of the skin and soft tissues (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.8-5.6); and infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.7-5.1) and S. pneumoniae (OR = 2.6, 95% C = 1.1-5.9). On a multivariable logistic regression analysis, the contribution of inappropriate empirical treatment to fatality was independent of other risk factors (multivariable adjusted OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 1.3-1.9).

CONCLUSION

Appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment was associated with a significant reduction in fatality in patients with bloodstream infection.

摘要

目的

检验符合病原体体外药敏结果的经验性抗生素治疗(恰当治疗)是否能提高血流感染患者的生存率,并衡量其提高程度。

设计

观察性前瞻性队列研究。

地点

以色列的大学医院。

研究对象

1988年至1994年间检测出的所有血流感染患者。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

住院死亡率和住院时间。

结果

在2158例接受恰当经验性抗生素治疗的患者中,436例(20%)死亡,而在1255例接受不恰当治疗的患者中,有432例(34%)死亡(P = 0.0001)。存活患者的住院中位时间,接受恰当治疗的患者为9天,接受不恰当治疗的患者为11天。对于死亡患者,两种比较的中位时间分别为5天和4天(P < 0.05)。在分层分析中,除两个亚组外,接受不恰当治疗的患者死亡率均高于接受恰当治疗的患者:由除A组链球菌和肺炎链球菌之外的链球菌引起感染的患者(优势比(OR)为1.0,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.4 - 2.5);体温过低的患者(OR = 0.9,95%CI = 0.3 - 2.4)。即使在感染性休克患者中,不恰当的经验性治疗也与较高的死亡率相关(OR = 1.6,95%CI = 1.0 - 2.7)。在儿科患者(OR = 5.1,95%CI = 2.4 - 10.7);腹腔内感染(OR = 3.8,95%CI = 2.0 - 7.1);皮肤和软组织感染(OR = 3.1,95%CI = 1.8 - 5.6);以及由肺炎克雷伯菌(OR = 3.0,95%CI = 1.7 - 5.1)和肺炎链球菌(OR = 2.6,95%CI = 1.1 - 5.9)引起的感染中,观察到恰当治疗带来的益处最大。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,不恰当的经验性治疗对死亡率的影响独立于其他风险因素(多变量调整OR = 1.6,95%CI = 1.3 - 1.9)。

结论

恰当的经验性抗生素治疗与血流感染患者死亡率的显著降低相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验