• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Applicability of the single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in a Norwegian Community Study.

作者信息

Welle I, Eide G E, Bakke P, Gulsvik A

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;158(6):1745-50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9712123.

DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9712123
PMID:9847262
Abstract

The test of single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) has been widely used in population surveys. However, little is known about the effect of meeting or failing to meet the criteria for acceptability of this test. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommends a breathholding time of 9 to 11 s, two measurements within +/- 10% or 3 ml CO(STPD)/min/mm Hg of the average DLCO, and an inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) of at least 90% of the largest previously measured forced vital capacity (FVC) as criteria for this test. The objective of the present study was to examine the extent to which these criteria were met in a community study. To do this, a random sample of 3,740 persons, aged 15 to 70 yr, of the general population of the city of Bergen and 11 surrounding municipalities on the southwest coast of Norway were enrolled in a two-phase cross-sectional study. In the second phase, a stratified sample (n = 1,512) of the respondents to the postal questionnaire used for recruitment for the study (n = 3,370) were invited to a clinical and respiratory physiologic examination that included the DLCO test. The attendance rate was 84% (1,275 of 1,512). In the examination, all subjects were able to maintain a breathholding time of 9 to 11 s, and 98% had two DLCO values within +/- 10% or 3 ml CO(STPD)/min/mm Hg of the average DLCO. The criterion of an IVC of at least 90% of FVC in the two tests was met by 68% of the subjects. Younger age was an independent predictor of failure to meet the required criteria. Thus, only two-thirds of the participants fulfilled all of the ATS criteria for the DLCO test, the main reason for failure being an IVC of less than 90% FVC. This should not necessarily lead to the exclusion from further analysis of those failing to meet this criterion.

摘要

相似文献

1
Applicability of the single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in a Norwegian Community Study.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;158(6):1745-50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.6.9712123.
2
Longitudinal decline in measured firefighter single-breath diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide values. A respiratory surveillance dilemma.消防员一氧化碳单次呼吸弥散量测量值的纵向下降。一个呼吸监测难题。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jan;159(1):119-24. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9804153.
3
[Single-breath and rebreathing methods for measurement of pulmonary diffusing function: a comparative study].[单次呼吸法和重复呼吸法测量肺弥散功能的比较研究]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;36(7):510-5.
4
Early emphysematous changes in asymptomatic smokers: detection with 3He MR imaging.无症状吸烟者的早期肺气肿改变:用³He磁共振成像检测
Radiology. 2006 Jun;239(3):875-83. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2393050111.
5
Transfer coefficients better reflect emphysematous changes than carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in obstructive lung diseases.在阻塞性肺部疾病中,转移系数比一氧化碳弥散量更能反映肺气肿的变化。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Jul 1;125(1):183-189. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01062.2017. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Importance of adjusting carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO) for alveolar volume.调整一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)和一氧化碳转移系数(KCO)以适应肺泡容积的重要性。
Respir Med. 2000 Jan;94(1):28-37. doi: 10.1053/rmed.1999.0740.
7
Lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide and carbon monoxide: dependence on breath-hold time.一氧化氮和一氧化碳的肺弥散能力:对屏气时间的依赖性。
Chest. 2008 May;133(5):1149-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2388. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
8
Diurnal variation in pulmonary diffusing capacity and expiratory volumes.肺弥散能力和呼气量的日变化
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 1980 Apr-Jun;24(2):112-8.
9
Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity prediction equations from a Mediterranean population.来自地中海人群的单次呼吸一氧化碳弥散能力预测方程。
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Apr;141(4 Pt 1):1026-32. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.4_Pt_1.1026.
10
Comparison of carbon monoxide (CO) single breath pulmonary diffusing capacity with non-rebreathing, open-circuit CO pulmonary diffusing capacity in healthy children.健康儿童中一氧化碳(CO)单次呼吸肺弥散量与无重复呼吸、开路式CO肺弥散量的比较。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Nov;41(11):1095-102. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20504.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Consistency, Feasibility, and Convenience of a Novel Compact System for Assessing Lung Volumes and Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity versus Whole Body Plethysmography.一种用于评估肺容积和一氧化碳弥散能力的新型紧凑型系统与全身体积描记法在一致性、可行性和便利性方面的比较。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jul 7;13:637-643. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S316529. eCollection 2021.
2
ARTP statement on pulmonary function testing 2020.ARTP 关于肺功能测试的声明 2020.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Jul;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000575.
3
Change in pulmonary diffusion capacity in a general population sample over 9 years.
普通人群样本中9年期间肺弥散能力的变化。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2016 Sep 2;3:31265. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.31265. eCollection 2016.