Suppr超能文献

[使用99mTc-MAG3测定血浆清除率的单样本方法比较]

[Comparison of single sample methods for determination of plasma clearance using 99mTc-MAG3].

作者信息

Itoh K, Tsukamoto E, Mochizuki T, Kanegae K, Katoh C, Tamaki N

机构信息

Department of Radiology, JR Sapporo General Hospital.

出版信息

Kaku Igaku. 1998 Oct;35(8):689-95.

PMID:9847510
Abstract

We compared relationship among three single blood sampling methods which have been proposed for determination of plasma clearance with 99mTc-MAG3. Russell's and Bubeck's algorithms were employed for 48 adults (average age: 53 years) and Bubeck's and Piepsz's algorithms were used in 9 children (average age: 5.8 years). Three methods showed very high correlation among them. However, Russell's and Piepsz's methods were about 1.4 times higher than Bubeck's method in calculating plasma clearance of 99mTc-MAG3. The present study indicates that three methods discussed here are useful for the determination of plasma clearance with 99mTc-MAG3. In addition, Bubeck's method may be preferable as a reference for single plasma sampling method because of common application to adults and children.

摘要

我们比较了三种已被提出用于通过99mTc-MAG3测定血浆清除率的单次采血方法之间的关系。48名成年人(平均年龄:53岁)采用了拉塞尔算法和布贝克算法,9名儿童(平均年龄:5.8岁)使用了布贝克算法和皮耶普斯算法。三种方法之间显示出非常高的相关性。然而,在计算99mTc-MAG3的血浆清除率时,拉塞尔法和皮耶普斯法比布贝克法高约1.4倍。本研究表明,这里讨论的三种方法对于通过99mTc-MAG3测定血浆清除率是有用的。此外,由于布贝克法在成人和儿童中都普遍适用,它可能是单次血浆采样方法的首选参考方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验