Suppr超能文献

[提高99mTc-MAG3血浆清除率方法的准确性:计算血浆容量的问题及其修正]

[Improved the accuracy of 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance method: the problem of the calculated plasma volume and its modification].

作者信息

Watanabe N, Takahashi K, Komatani A, Yamaguchi K

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Yamagata University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Kaku Igaku. 1998 Oct;35(8):741-7.

PMID:9847517
Abstract

The 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance method (MPC method), reported by Oriuchi et al., is a simple and useful count-based gamma camera method for calculating the 99mTc-MAG3 plasma clearance (CLMAG). However, a discrepancy of CLMAG calculated by MPC method (MPC-CLMAG) from the tubular extraction rate (TER) calculated by Russell's single-sample clearance determination (Russell-TER) was noted. The calculated plasma volume is assumed to be the cause. Since the plasma volume is reported to have a linear correlation with body surface area, Dissmann's formula was applied to calculate the plasma volume. Then Dissmann's formula was replaced by Ogawa's formula in the MPC method, and the procedure was then called the modified MPC method. The CLMAG were obtained using MPC method, modified MPC method and the TER was obtained Russell's method in 95 patients with urological disorders. Then the MPC-CLMAG and modified MPC-CLMAG were compared with Russell-TER. Comparison of the MPC-CLMAG with the Russell-TER demonstrated a coefficient of correlation of 0.82, but dissociation of the slope of regression lines was found between males and females. The modified MPC-CLMAG improved the coefficient of correlation to 0.92, and diminished the dissociation of the slope of regression lines between males and females. We verified that the dissociation was due to the plasma volume calculated by Ogawa's formula. Ogawa's formula included hematocrit, body weight, body height and different coefficients for gender. The plasma volume calculated by Ogawa's formula were lower in males and higher in females than that calculated by Dissmann's formula. And marked discrepancy in the plasma volume in patients with a body surface area below 0.5 m2 was observed. So the MPC method might become more accurate by substituting Dissmann's formula for Ogawa's formula resolting in a method that is applicable to both males and females, children and adults in clinical use.

摘要

大内里等报道的99mTc-MAG3血浆清除率法(MPC法)是一种简单且实用的基于计数的γ相机法,用于计算99mTc-MAG3血浆清除率(CLMAG)。然而,注意到MPC法计算的CLMAG(MPC-CLMAG)与罗素单样本清除率测定法计算的肾小管提取率(罗素-TER)之间存在差异。据推测,计算出的血浆量是造成差异的原因。由于据报道血浆量与体表面积呈线性相关,因此应用迪斯曼公式来计算血浆量。然后在MPC法中用小川公式取代迪斯曼公式,该程序随后被称为改良MPC法。在95例泌尿系统疾病患者中,使用MPC法、改良MPC法获得CLMAG,并使用罗素法获得TER。然后将MPC-CLMAG和改良MPC-CLMAG与罗素-TER进行比较。MPC-CLMAG与罗素-TER的比较显示相关系数为0.82,但发现男性和女性之间回归线斜率存在离散。改良MPC-CLMAG将相关系数提高到0.92,并减少了男性和女性之间回归线斜率的离散。我们证实这种离散是由于小川公式计算的血浆量所致。小川公式包括血细胞比容、体重、身高以及不同性别的系数。小川公式计算的血浆量在男性中低于迪斯曼公式计算的结果,在女性中则高于迪斯曼公式计算的结果。并且观察到体表面积低于0.5平方米的患者血浆量存在明显差异。因此,用小川公式取代迪斯曼公式可能会使MPC法更准确,从而形成一种在临床应用中适用于男性和女性、儿童和成人的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验