Zucchelli G, Cesari C, Clauser C, DeSanctis M
Department of Periodontology, Bologna University, Italy.
J Periodontol. 1998 Nov;69(11):1193-202. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.11.1193.
The aim of the study was to compare the in vivo early bacterial plaque colonization of 3 different guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membrane materials using a morphological (scanning electron microscope) method. Rectangular-shaped strips were cut from 3 periodontal membranes (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, polyglactin 910, and polylactic acid) and glued to the buccal aspect of removable acrylic devices, which were applied to the molar-premolar region of the upper quadrants in 8 dental students. Each device held 3 strips: one ePTFE, one polyglactin 910, and one polylactic acid. The surface roughness of each membrane material was measured by means of a laser profilometer. During a 24-hour period, the students had to refrain from any oral hygiene procedures and did not use chlorhexidine mouthrinses. In each subject, one device was removed after 4 hours and the other after 24 hours. After removal, the devices were placed in a 2.5% gluteraldehyde solution to fix the membranes, which were then processed for SEM analysis. Fifty-four microscopic fields (at 200x magnification) were randomly selected and analyzed in each strip. Magnification was increased to determine the presence of bacterial morphotypes. The presence or absence of bacteria was assessed in a binomial fashion. In such a system, the field was bacteria-positive when bacteria constituted the deposits covering the surface of the membrane. The microscopic field was considered bacteria-negative when no bacteria were present. Bacteria-positive fields showing rods and filaments as prevalent bacterial morphotypes were recorded as rod-positive fields. A different pattern of plaque accumulation was demonstrated on different membrane materials. The 4-hour results indicated a statistically significant difference (P = 0.008, ANOVA) in the proportion of bacteria-positive fields among the 3 membranes; a greater amount of bacteria was demonstrated on the ePTFE membrane compared to the other 2 membranes. At 24 hours, the difference in the proportion of bacteria-positive fields was statistically significant (P = 0.002, ANOVA); a lesser amount of bacterial plaque was present on the polylactic acid membrane compared to the ePTFE and polyglactin 910 membranes. No difference in the proportion of rod/bacteria-positive fields was demonstrated among the 3 membranes at either 4 or 24 hours. It was concluded that quantitative differences in early plaque accumulation on various membranes seem to be related to the textural and structural characteristics of the surface, which is not adequately represented by the surface Ra value measured with a profilometric instrument.
本研究的目的是使用形态学方法(扫描电子显微镜)比较3种不同引导组织再生(GTR)膜材料在体内早期细菌菌斑的定植情况。从3种牙周膜(膨体聚四氟乙烯、聚乙醇酸910和聚乳酸)上切下矩形条带,粘贴到可摘丙烯酸装置的颊侧,该装置应用于8名牙科学生上象限的磨牙-前磨牙区域。每个装置固定3条带:一条膨体聚四氟乙烯、一条聚乙醇酸910和一条聚乳酸。每种膜材料的表面粗糙度通过激光轮廓仪测量。在24小时内,学生们必须避免任何口腔卫生措施,且不使用洗必泰漱口水。在每个受试者中,一个装置在4小时后取出,另一个在24小时后取出。取出后,将装置置于2.5%的戊二醛溶液中固定膜,然后进行扫描电镜分析。在每个条带上随机选择并分析54个微观视野(放大倍数为200倍)。放大倍数增加以确定细菌形态类型的存在。以二项式方式评估细菌的存在与否。在这样的系统中,当细菌构成覆盖膜表面的沉积物时,该视野为细菌阳性。当没有细菌存在时,微观视野被认为是细菌阴性。显示杆状和丝状为主要细菌形态类型的细菌阳性视野被记录为杆状阳性视野。不同膜材料上显示出不同的菌斑积累模式。4小时的结果表明,3种膜之间细菌阳性视野的比例存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.008,方差分析);与其他2种膜相比,膨体聚四氟乙烯膜上的细菌数量更多。在24小时时,细菌阳性视野比例的差异具有统计学显著性(P = 0.002,方差分析);与膨体聚四氟乙烯膜和聚乙醇酸910膜相比,聚乳酸膜上的细菌菌斑数量较少。在4小时或24小时时,3种膜之间杆状/细菌阳性视野的比例均未显示出差异。得出的结论是,各种膜上早期菌斑积累的定量差异似乎与表面的纹理和结构特征有关,而用轮廓仪测量的表面粗糙度Ra值并不能充分体现这些特征。