• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估引导组织和骨再生膜体外细菌定植的新型装置。

A Novel Device for the Evaluation of In Vitro Bacterial Colonization in Membranes for Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration.

作者信息

Gil Ana Clara Kuerten, Merino Eugenio A D, Costa Diogo Pontes, Giracca César Nunes, Mazzon Ricardo, Magrin Gabriel Leonardo, de Almeida Josiane, Benfatti Cesar Augusto Magalhães

机构信息

Department of Implant Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil.

Department of Production Engineering, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis 88040-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 29;12(7):202. doi: 10.3390/dj12070202.

DOI:10.3390/dj12070202
PMID:39056989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11275268/
Abstract

To evaluate, in vitro, the efficiency of a novel apparatus to test the adherence and penetration of bacteria on different membranes for guided regeneration. To create the 3D device, Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems were used. Three types of biomaterials were tested ( = 6): (DT) a collagen membrane; (DS) a polymer membrane; and (LP) a dense polytetrafluoroethylene barrier. The biomaterials were adapted to the apparatuses and challenged with two different monospecies bacterial culture of and . After 2 h, bacterial adherence and penetration were quantified by counting the number of colony-forming units (CFUs). Two specimens from each group were used for image analysis using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed. The DS group had a higher adherence of compared to ( = 0.05). There was less adherence of in the DS group, compared to the LP ( = 0.011) and DT ( < 0.001) groups. Only the membranes allowed penetration, which was blocked by barriers. The DT group allowed a greater penetration of to occur compared to ( = 0.009), which showed a higher penetration into the DS membranes compared to ( = 0.016). The penetration of through DS was higher compared to its penetration through DT and LP ( < 0.01 for both). DT and DS allowed a greater penetration of to occur compared to LP, which prevented both bacterial species from penetrating. The apparatus allowed for the settlement and complete sealing of the biomaterials, enabling standardization.

摘要

为了在体外评估一种新型装置测试细菌在不同引导性再生膜上的黏附及穿透效率。使用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统制作3D装置。测试了三种生物材料(每组n = 6):(DT)胶原膜;(DS)聚合物膜;以及(LP)致密聚四氟乙烯屏障。将生物材料适配于装置,并分别用两种不同的单一菌种细菌培养物(金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌)进行挑战。2小时后,通过计数菌落形成单位(CFU)数量对细菌黏附及穿透进行定量。每组取两个样本用于共聚焦激光扫描显微镜图像分析。进行了统计分析。与大肠杆菌相比,DS组金黄色葡萄球菌的黏附率更高(P = 0.05)。与LP组(P = 0.011)和DT组(P < 0.001)相比,DS组大肠杆菌的黏附较少。只有膜允许穿透,屏障可阻止穿透。与大肠杆菌相比,DT组金黄色葡萄球菌的穿透率更高(P = 0.009),而与金黄色葡萄球菌相比,大肠杆菌在DS膜中的穿透率更高(P = 0.016)。金黄色葡萄球菌通过DS的穿透率高于其通过DT和LP的穿透率(两者P < 0.01)。与LP组相比,DT组和DS组金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的穿透率更高,LP组可阻止两种细菌穿透。该装置可实现生物材料的固定和完全密封,从而实现标准化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/66800ec66017/dentistry-12-00202-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/3498a97e71d1/dentistry-12-00202-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/9f726694efe8/dentistry-12-00202-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/415a745fb4e8/dentistry-12-00202-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/66800ec66017/dentistry-12-00202-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/3498a97e71d1/dentistry-12-00202-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/9f726694efe8/dentistry-12-00202-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/415a745fb4e8/dentistry-12-00202-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fae4/11275268/66800ec66017/dentistry-12-00202-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Device for the Evaluation of In Vitro Bacterial Colonization in Membranes for Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration.一种用于评估引导组织和骨再生膜体外细菌定植的新型装置。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 29;12(7):202. doi: 10.3390/dj12070202.
2
Bacterial penetration through antibiotic-loaded guided tissue regeneration membranes.细菌穿透载有抗生素的引导组织再生膜。
J Periodontol. 2009 Sep;80(9):1471-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090044.
3
In vitro evaluation of membranes for regenerative procedures against oral bacteria.体外评估针对口腔细菌的再生程序用膜。
Braz Dent J. 2023 May-Jun;34(3):57-65. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305060.
4
Evaluation of the Antibacterial Effect of Silver Nanoparticles on Guided Tissue Regeneration Membrane Colonization--An in Vitro Study.银纳米颗粒对引导组织再生膜定植的抗菌作用评估——一项体外研究
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2015 Jul;17(3):66-76.
5
Bacterial adhesion to antibiotic-loaded guided tissue regeneration membranes - a scanning electron microscopy study.细菌对抗生素负载引导组织再生膜的黏附——一项扫描电子显微镜研究
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Jan;114(1):35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
6
Permeability of Streptococcus mutans and Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans Through guided tissue regeneration membranes and their effects on attachment of periodontal ligament cells.变形链球菌和伴放线放线杆菌通过引导组织再生膜的通透性及其对牙周膜细胞附着的影响。
J Periodontol. 2002 Aug;73(8):843-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.8.843.
7
Comparison of the penetration and passage of Streptococcus mutans and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans through membranes loaded with tetracycline, amoxicillin, and chlorhexidine: an in vitro study.变形链球菌和伴放线聚集杆菌通过负载四环素、阿莫西林和氯己定的膜的穿透与通过情况比较:一项体外研究。
J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Feb;25(1):87-97. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2013-0039.
8
In vitro evaluation of barrier function against oral bacteria of dense and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes for guided bone regeneration.用于引导骨再生的致密和膨化聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)膜对口腔细菌屏障功能的体外评价。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):738-748. doi: 10.1111/cid.12629. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
9
Bacterial adherence to guided tissue regeneration barrier membranes exposed to the oral environment.细菌对暴露于口腔环境中的引导组织再生屏障膜的黏附。
J Periodontol. 1997 Feb;68(2):172-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.2.172.
10
Adherence of oral microorganisms to guided tissue membranes: an in vitro study.口腔微生物对引导组织膜的黏附:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 1994 Mar;65(3):211-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.3.211.

引用本文的文献

1
The Microbial Diversity and Biofilm Characteristics of d-PTFE Membranes Used for Socket Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.用于牙槽窝保存的d-PTFE膜的微生物多样性和生物膜特征:一项随机对照临床试验
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 23;16(2):40. doi: 10.3390/jfb16020040.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro evaluation of membranes for regenerative procedures against oral bacteria.体外评估针对口腔细菌的再生程序用膜。
Braz Dent J. 2023 May-Jun;34(3):57-65. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202305060.
2
Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR): A Focus on Recent Advances in Collagen Membranes.引导性骨再生(GBR)用屏障膜:聚焦于胶原蛋白膜的最新进展。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 29;23(23):14987. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314987.
3
Bacterial Growth on Three Non-Resorbable Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Membranes-An In Vitro Study.
三种不可吸收聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)膜上细菌生长的体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 18;15(16):5705. doi: 10.3390/ma15165705.
4
Permeability of P. gingivalis or its metabolic products through collagen and dPTFE membranes and their effects on the viability of osteoblast-like cells: an in vitro study.牙龈卟啉单胞菌或其代谢产物通过胶原蛋白和 dPTFE 膜的通透性及其对成骨样细胞活力的影响:一项体外研究。
Odontology. 2022 Oct;110(4):710-718. doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00705-9. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
5
Adhesion of Oral Bacteria to Commercial d-PTFE Membranes: Polymer Microstructure Makes a Difference.口腔细菌对商用 d-PTFE 膜的黏附:聚合物微观结构有影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 10;23(6):2983. doi: 10.3390/ijms23062983.
6
Advances in Modification Methods Based on Biodegradable Membranes in Guided Bone/Tissue Regeneration: A Review.基于可生物降解膜的引导性骨/组织再生修饰方法的研究进展:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;14(5):871. doi: 10.3390/polym14050871.
7
Poly(lactic acid/caprolactone) bilayer membrane blocks bacterial penetration.聚(乳酸/己内酯)双层膜阻止细菌渗透。
J Periodontal Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):510-518. doi: 10.1111/jre.12980. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
8
The Collagen Origin Influences the Degradation Kinetics of Guided Bone Regeneration Membranes.胶原蛋白来源影响引导骨再生膜的降解动力学。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Sep 5;13(17):3007. doi: 10.3390/polym13173007.
9
Bacterial adhesion to collagens: implications for biofilm formation and disease progression in the oral cavity.细菌与胶原蛋白的黏附:对口腔生物膜形成和疾病进展的影响。
Crit Rev Microbiol. 2022 Feb;48(1):83-95. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2021.1944054. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
Testing active membranes for bone regeneration: A review.测试用于骨再生的活性膜:综述。
J Dent. 2021 Feb;105:103580. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103580. Epub 2021 Jan 5.