Suppr超能文献

日间妇科腹腔镜手术在正压通气下的胃食管反流:喉罩与气管插管的比较

Gastro-oesophageal reflux during day case gynaecological laparoscopy under positive pressure ventilation: laryngeal mask vs. tracheal intubation.

作者信息

Ho B Y, Skinner H J, Mahajan R P

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Nottingham City Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1998 Sep;53(9):921-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00461.x.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether or not the use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation via the laryngeal mask airway is associated with a higher risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux when compared with intermittent positive pressure ventilation via a tracheal tube in patients undergoing day case gynaecological laparoscopy in the head down position. Sixty healthy women were randomly allocated to receive either the laryngeal mask or cuffed tracheal tube for intra-operative airway maintenance. Using continuous oesophageal pH monitoring, four patients in the tracheal tube group and none in the laryngeal mask group had evidence of gastro-oesophageal reflux (as indicated by a decrease in oesophageal pH to below 4). The difference in the incidence of reflux did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.11). In conclusion, we found no evidence to suggest that the use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation via the laryngeal mask increases the risk of gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients undergoing elective day case gynaecological laparoscopy.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在头低体位下行日间妇科腹腔镜手术的患者中,与经气管导管进行间歇性正压通气相比,经喉罩气道进行间歇性正压通气是否会增加胃食管反流的风险。60名健康女性被随机分配接受喉罩或带套囊气管导管以维持术中气道。通过连续食管pH监测,气管导管组有4例患者出现胃食管反流迹象(食管pH降至4以下),而喉罩组无患者出现该情况。反流发生率的差异未达到统计学显著性(p = 0.11)。总之,我们没有发现证据表明在择期日间妇科腹腔镜手术患者中,经喉罩进行间歇性正压通气会增加胃食管反流的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验