Suppr超能文献

水果和蔬菜摄入量的人口统计学及社会心理预测因素存在差异:对饮食干预的启示。

Demographic and psychosocial predictors of fruit and vegetable intakes differ: implications for dietary interventions.

作者信息

Trudeau E, Kristal A R, Li S, Patterson R E

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Research Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Wash 98109-1024, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Dec;98(12):1412-7. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00319-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The National Cancer Institute (Rockville, Md) has launched a nationwide initiative--5 A Day for Better Health--to encourage consumption of fruits and vegetables. Because the tastes and culinary uses of fruits and vegetables differ, however, it is not known whether a general 5-A-Day message is an effective intervention strategy. This study examined whether there are differences between the demographic and psychosocial correlates of fruit and vegetable intakes.

DESIGN

Data are from the Washington State Cancer Risk Behavior Survey (1995-1996), a cross-sectional, random-digit-dial telephone survey representative of the adult population of Washington State.

SUBJECTS/SETTING: Interviews were completed with 1,450 adults. Data were collected about demographic characteristics, health status, health-related behavior, fruit and vegetable intakes, and the following diet-related psychosocial factors: beliefs, motives, barriers, attitudes, and stages of dietary change.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to test whether the associations of demographic characteristics and psychosocial factors with fruit intake differed from associations with vegetable intake.

RESULTS

In general, health status, health-related behavior, and psychosocial factors were more strongly associated with fruit intakes than vegetable intakes. For example, regular exercisers consumed 0.44 more daily servings of fruits and 0.36 more servings of vegetables than nonexercisers. Compared with those in the preaction stage of dietary change, adults in the maintenance stage consumed 0.99 more daily servings of fruits and 0.68 more servings of vegetables. Intrinsic motivations for eating a healthful diet (eg, to feel better) were strongly associated with both fruit and vegetable intakes, and these associations were stronger for fruit. Extrinsic motivations were not associated with either fruit or vegetable intakes.

APPLICATIONS

Dietary interventions based on a general 5-A-Day message may be more effective in increasing fruit intakes than vegetable intakes. Targeted interventions that focus specifically on vegetables are probably necessary. Intrinsic motives for eating a healthful diet should be key components of interventions to increase fruit and vegetable intakes.

摘要

目的

美国国立癌症研究所(马里兰州罗克维尔)发起了一项全国性倡议——“每日五蔬果,健康更美好”,以鼓励人们食用水果和蔬菜。然而,由于水果和蔬菜的口味及烹饪用途各不相同,尚不清楚“每日五蔬果”这一普遍信息是否为有效的干预策略。本研究探讨了水果和蔬菜摄入量在人口统计学及心理社会因素方面的相关性是否存在差异。

设计

数据来自华盛顿州癌症风险行为调查(1995 - 1996年),这是一项横断面随机数字拨号电话调查,代表了华盛顿州的成年人口。

研究对象/背景:对1450名成年人进行了访谈。收集了有关人口统计学特征、健康状况、健康相关行为、水果和蔬菜摄入量以及以下与饮食相关的心理社会因素的数据:信念、动机、障碍、态度以及饮食改变阶段。

统计分析

采用多元线性回归分析来检验人口统计学特征和心理社会因素与水果摄入量的关联是否不同于与蔬菜摄入量的关联。

结果

总体而言,健康状况、健康相关行为和心理社会因素与水果摄入量的关联比与蔬菜摄入量的关联更强。例如,经常锻炼的人每天食用的水果份数比不锻炼的人多0.44份,蔬菜份数多0.36份。与处于饮食改变前期阶段的成年人相比,处于维持阶段的成年人每天食用的水果份数多0.99份,蔬菜份数多0.68份。健康饮食的内在动机(如感觉更好)与水果和蔬菜摄入量均密切相关,且与水果的关联更强。外在动机与水果或蔬菜摄入量均无关联。

应用

基于“每日五蔬果”这一普遍信息的饮食干预在增加水果摄入量方面可能比增加蔬菜摄入量更有效。可能需要专门针对蔬菜的针对性干预措施。健康饮食的内在动机应成为增加水果和蔬菜摄入量干预措施的关键组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验