Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Am J Sports Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(6):764-72. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260060501.
The purpose of this study was to develop a valid, reliable, and responsive disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for patients with shoulder instability. Development included 1) identification of a specific patient population; 2) generation of issues specific to the "disease" ("items") from reviewing the literature, interviewing health caregivers, and interviewing patients representing all demographics, disease type and severity, and treatments; 3) item reduction using patient-generated frequency-importance products and correlation matrices; and 4) pretesting the prototype instrument on 2 groups of 10 patients. The final instrument, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, has 21 items representing 4 domains. The instrument attributes (validity, reliability, and responsiveness) were evaluated. Construct validation demonstrated that this index correlated predictably with other measures. Reliability was very high at 2 weeks and 3 months, and the index was more responsive (sensitive to change) than five other shoulder measurement tools (the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale; The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form; the UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale; the Constant Score; and the Rowe Rating Scale), a global health instrument (the SF12), and range of motion. Since the patient's perception of changes in health status is the most important indicator of the success of a treatment, we suggest that this measurement tool be used as the primary outcome measure to evaluate treatments in this patient population, although it can also be used for monitoring patients' progress in clinical practice.
本研究的目的是为肩关节不稳定患者开发一种有效、可靠且具有反应性的疾病特异性生活质量测量工具。开发过程包括:1)确定特定患者群体;2)通过查阅文献、采访医护人员以及采访代表所有人口统计学特征、疾病类型和严重程度以及治疗方法的患者,生成与“疾病”相关的特定问题(“条目”);3)使用患者生成的频率-重要性乘积和相关矩阵减少条目;4)在两组各10名患者中对原型工具进行预测试。最终的工具——西安大略肩关节不稳定指数,有21个条目,代表4个领域。对该工具的属性(有效性、可靠性和反应性)进行了评估。结构效度表明,该指数与其他测量方法具有可预测的相关性。在2周和3个月时,可靠性非常高,并且该指数比其他五种肩部测量工具(手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍量表;美国肩肘外科医生标准化肩部评估表;加州大学洛杉矶分校肩部评分量表;常数评分;以及罗伊评分量表)、一种全球健康工具(SF12)和活动范围更具反应性(对变化敏感)。由于患者对健康状况变化的感知是治疗成功的最重要指标,我们建议将此测量工具用作评估该患者群体治疗效果的主要结局指标,尽管它也可用于监测患者在临床实践中的进展。