Suppr超能文献

使用表面麻醉和球周麻醉的巩膜隧道切口白内障手术中的疼痛

Pain in scleral pocket incision cataract surgery using topical and peribulbar anesthesia.

作者信息

Virtanen P, Huha T

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 Dec;24(12):1609-13. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80351-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the pain produced during different phases of phacoemulsification cataract surgery using a scleral pocket incision under topical versus peribulbar anesthesia.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

METHODS

This prospective study comprised 100 cataract patients who were randomly selected to have phacoemulsification with a scleral pocket incision using either topical or peribulbar anesthesia. Topical anesthesia comprised oxybuprocaine 0.4% drops. Peribulbar anesthesia was given with an inferolateral transconjuctival injection of an even mixture of lidocaine 2% and bupivacaine 0.5% with hyaluronidase. Inadvertent eye movement during surgery was recorded. Pain occurring during intravenous line cannulation, introduction of the anesthetic agent, and phacoemulsification was measured using a visual analog scale (from 0 to 10) and a descriptive verbal 5-step scale. Patients were asked about pain immediately after each phase.

RESULTS

The pain during cannulation was similar in both groups (P = .498). The peribulbar injection was statistically significantly more painful than induction of topical anesthesia (2.11 and 0.10, respectively; P < .001). Surgery was statistically significantly more painful in the topical group than in the peribulbar group (2.76 and 0.85, respectively; P < .001). The mean pain score during all 3 phases was similar (1.43 topical group and 1.51 peribulbar group; P = .500). On the verbal scale, surgery was more painful under topical than under peribulbar anesthesia (P < .001). There were no statistical differences in pain during the peribulbar injection and during cannulation (P = .461 and P = .462, respectively). Inadvertent eye movement occurred more often in the topical anesthesia group.

CONCLUSION

Considering the entire procedure, total pain using topical anesthesia was acceptable and equal to that using peribulbar anesthesia for phacoemulsification with a scleral pocket incision. Pain during phacoemulsification was greater under topical anesthesia but not significantly different from the pain during the peribulbar injection.

摘要

目的

评估在表面麻醉与球周麻醉下,采用巩膜隧道切口的白内障超声乳化手术不同阶段产生的疼痛。

设置

芬兰奥卢大学医院眼科。

方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了100例白内障患者,他们被随机选择接受采用表面麻醉或球周麻醉、巩膜隧道切口的超声乳化手术。表面麻醉采用0.4%奥布卡因滴眼液。球周麻醉通过下外侧结膜下注射2%利多卡因、0.5%布比卡因与透明质酸酶的均匀混合液进行。记录手术过程中意外的眼球运动。使用视觉模拟评分法(0至10分)和描述性语言5级评分法测量静脉置管、麻醉剂注入和超声乳化过程中出现的疼痛。在每个阶段结束后立即询问患者疼痛情况。

结果

两组在置管期间的疼痛相似(P = 0.498)。球周注射在统计学上比表面麻醉诱导更痛(分别为2.11和0.10;P < 0.001)。表面麻醉组手术时的疼痛在统计学上显著高于球周麻醉组(分别为2.76和0.85;P < 0.001)。所有3个阶段的平均疼痛评分相似(表面麻醉组为1.43,球周麻醉组为1.51;P = 0.500)。在语言评分方面,表面麻醉下手术比球周麻醉更痛(P < 0.001)。球周注射期间和置管期间的疼痛无统计学差异(分别为P = 0.461和P = 0.462)。表面麻醉组意外眼球运动更常见。

结论

考虑整个手术过程,表面麻醉的总疼痛程度是可接受的,并且与球周麻醉用于巩膜隧道切口白内障超声乳化手术时的疼痛程度相当。表面麻醉下超声乳化过程中的疼痛更大,但与球周注射时的疼痛无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验