Zehetmayer M, Radax U, Skorpik C, Menapace R, Schemper M, Weghaupt H, Scholz U
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Austria.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 May;22(4):480-4. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80046-0.
To evaluate the efficacy of topical anesthesia as an alternative to peribulbar anesthesia in clear corneal cataract surgery.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Austria.
In this prospective, double-blind clinical trial, 36 patients had bilateral cataract surgeries performed from 1 to 3 months apart. Half of the patients had topical anesthesia for the first surgery and peribulbar anesthesia for the second surgery. The other half had peribulbar first and then topical. All surgery was done using a temporal clear corneal approach and bimanual phacoemulsification followed by in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation. Subjective pain was assessed using a visual analog scale of no pain (0%) to worst pain imaginable (100%) and intraoperative motility using a rank scale of adverse motility (-5) to ideal patient cooperation (+5).
Subjective pain was comparable whether topical or peribulbar anesthesia was used (mean 10.75 versus 10.97%; P > .6). Patient cooperation (motility) was significantly better when topical anesthesia was used (+2.16 versus +1.11; P = .03). There were no significant differences in complications. A peribulbar block was given in addition to the topical anesthesia in two cases.
Topical anesthesia is a safe, effective alternative to peribulbar anesthesia in clear corneal cataract surgery.
评估表面麻醉作为透明角膜白内障手术球周麻醉替代方法的疗效。
奥地利维也纳大学眼科。
在这项前瞻性双盲临床试验中,36例患者相隔1至3个月接受双侧白内障手术。一半患者第一次手术采用表面麻醉,第二次手术采用球周麻醉。另一半患者先进行球周麻醉,然后进行表面麻醉。所有手术均采用颞侧透明角膜入路,双手微切口超声乳化术,随后行囊袋内人工晶状体植入术。使用从无疼痛(0%)到可想象的最严重疼痛(100%)的视觉模拟量表评估主观疼痛,使用从不良活动度(-5)到理想患者配合度(+5)的等级量表评估术中活动度。
无论使用表面麻醉还是球周麻醉,主观疼痛程度相当(平均分别为10.75%和10.97%;P>.6)。使用表面麻醉时患者配合度(活动度)明显更好(分别为+2.16和+1.11;P=.03)。并发症方面无显著差异。有2例患者在表面麻醉基础上还进行了球周阻滞。
在透明角膜白内障手术中,表面麻醉是球周麻醉的一种安全、有效的替代方法。