Bertolaccini M L, Roch B, Amengual O, Atsumi T, Khamashta M A, Hughes G R
Lupus Research Unit, The Rayne Institute, St Thomas' Hospital, London.
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Nov;37(11):1229-32. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1229.
The family of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) includes a heterogeneous population of autoantibodies whose specificity is directed against not only phospholipids, but their complex with plasma proteins. Anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests are widely performed to screen the aPL family which is associated with thrombotic complications in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The clinical significance of other aPL tests, including antibodies against phosphatidylserine (aPS), phosphatidylinositol (aPI), phosphatidic acid (aPA), phosphatidylcholine (aPC) and phosphatidylethanolamine (aPE), has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether multiple aPL tests have enhanced diagnostic value for APS. We tested IgG/M/A aPS, aPI, aPA, aPC and aPE by ELISA using 10% bovine serum as blocking and sample diluent in 26 SLE patients with clinical manifestations of APS, but negative for both aCL and LA (Group 1). The results were compared with 32 SLE patients without any features of APS (Group 2) and 24 SLE patients with APS (aCL and/or LA positive) (Group 3). In Group 1, 1/26 (4%) was positive for IgA aPE, less frequent than in other groups, and none of the patients had any other aPL. In Group 2, 1/32 (3%) was positive for aPS, two (6%) for aPI, one (3%) for aPA and four (12.5%) for aPE. None was positive for aPC. In the third group, 13/24 (54%) were positive for aPS, 11 (46%) for aPI, 15 (63%) for aPA, four (17%) for aPC and seven (29%) for aPE. Since aPE was found in some patients, we extended the study, including 207 SLE patients, and tested aPE. IgG/M/A aPE was found in six (3%), 10(5%) and 21 (10%), respectively, but no association was found between aPE and any clinical features of APS. This study suggests that screening by multiple aPL tests does not increase the diagnostic yield in APS.
抗磷脂抗体(aPL)家族包括多种自身抗体,其特异性不仅针对磷脂,还针对磷脂与血浆蛋白的复合物。抗心磷脂抗体(aCL)和狼疮抗凝物(LA)检测被广泛用于筛查与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)或抗磷脂综合征(APS)患者血栓形成并发症相关的aPL家族。其他aPL检测的临床意义,包括抗磷脂酰丝氨酸(aPS)、抗磷脂酰肌醇(aPI)、抗磷脂酸(aPA)、抗磷脂酰胆碱(aPC)和抗磷脂酰乙醇胺(aPE)抗体,尚未明确。本研究的目的是评估多项aPL检测对APS是否具有更高的诊断价值。我们采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法,以10%牛血清作为封闭剂和样品稀释剂,检测了26例有APS临床表现但aCL和LA均为阴性的SLE患者(第1组)的IgG/M/A aPS、aPI、aPA、aPC和aPE。将结果与32例无APS任何特征的SLE患者(第2组)和24例aCL和/或LA阳性的APS患者(第3组)进行比较。在第1组中,1/26(4%)的患者IgA aPE呈阳性,其发生率低于其他组,且没有患者出现任何其他aPL阳性。在第2组中,1/32(3%)的患者aPS呈阳性,2例(6%)aPI呈阳性,1例(3%)aPA呈阳性,4例(12.5%)aPE呈阳性。aPC均为阴性。在第3组中,13/24(54%)的患者aPS呈阳性,11例(46%)aPI呈阳性,15例(63%)aPA呈阳性,4例(17%)aPC呈阳性,7例(29%)aPE呈阳性。由于在部分患者中发现了aPE,我们扩大了研究范围,纳入207例SLE患者并检测aPE。结果发现,IgG/M/A aPE阳性率分别为6例(3%)、10例(5%)和21例(10%),但未发现aPE与APS的任何临床特征之间存在关联。本研究表明,多项aPL检测筛查并不能提高APS的诊断率。