Doan N, Contreras A, Flynn J, Morrison J, Slots J
Department of Periodontology, Oral Microbiology Testing Laboratory, School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0641, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jan;37(1):171-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.1.171-174.1999.
Anaerobic culture is employed routinely in the primary isolation of periodontal pathogenic bacteria. However, little or no data exist on the relative abilities of the Coy anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Grass Lake, Mich.), the GasPak (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.), and the AnaeroPack (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America, Inc., New York, N.Y.) systems to grow important periodontal species, including Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens, Bacteroides forsythus, Eubacterium species, Campylobacter species, Fusobacterium species, and Peptostreptococcus micros. A total of 78 specimens from advanced periodontitis lesions were collected anaerobically, plated on enriched blood agar medium, and incubated at 35 degrees C for 5 to 7 days in each anaerobic culture system. The three culture systems were equally efficient in isolating Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens. The Coy anaerobic chamber yielded the highest proportional recoveries of Campylobacter (P = 0.0001; nonparametric analysis of variance) and Eubacterium (P = 0.009). The Coy anaerobic chamber and the GasPak system demonstrated higher proportional recoveries of Bacteroides forsythus (P = 0.0006) and Peptostreptococcus micros (P = 0.0001) than the AnaeroPack system. The AnaeroPack system was most efficient in growing Fusobacterium species (P = 0.0001). Overall, the Coy anaerobic chamber and the GasPak system showed the highest proportional recoveries of putative periodontal pathogens, but the recoveries by the various anaerobic test systems varied considerably from sample to sample.
厌氧培养常用于牙周病原菌的初次分离。然而,关于科伊厌氧箱(科伊实验室产品公司,密歇根州格拉斯湖)、气体发生袋系统(贝克顿·迪金森微生物系统公司,马里兰州科基斯维尔)和厌氧产气袋系统(三菱瓦斯化学美国公司,纽约州纽约市)培养包括牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌/变黑普氏菌、福赛坦氏菌、真杆菌属、弯曲杆菌属、梭杆菌属和微小消化链球菌在内的重要牙周菌种的相对能力,几乎没有相关数据。共从重度牙周炎病变中厌氧采集了78份标本,接种于富血琼脂培养基上,并在每种厌氧培养系统中于35℃孵育5至7天。这三种培养系统在分离牙龈卟啉单胞菌和中间普氏菌/变黑普氏菌方面效率相当。科伊厌氧箱弯曲杆菌(P = 0.0001;非参数方差分析)和真杆菌(P = 0.009)的比例回收率最高。与厌氧产气袋系统相比,科伊厌氧箱和气体发生袋系统福赛坦氏菌(P = 0.0006)和微小消化链球菌(P = 0.0001)的比例回收率更高。厌氧产气袋系统在培养梭杆菌属菌种方面效率最高(P = 0.0001)。总体而言,科伊厌氧箱和气体发生袋系统显示出假定牙周病原体的比例回收率最高,但不同厌氧测试系统的回收率在不同样本间差异很大。