Van Horn K G, Warren K, Baccaglini E J
Department of Clinical Pathology, Westchester County Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Aug;35(8):2170-3. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.8.2170-2173.1997.
Growth of anaerobic bacteria in the AnaeroPack (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America, Inc., New York, N.Y.) anaerobic atmosphere generation systems, both the AnaeroPack jar and pouch and the AnaeroPack in a GasPak jar were considered equivalent to or better than growth obtained in the corresponding GasPak jar or pouch system (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) for 89 (86%) of the 103 anaerobes tested. There were a total of 26 discrepancies after 48 h of incubation, with 16 discrepancies unresolved after 96 h of incubation. The AnaeroPack jar and pouch never failed to reduce the anaerobic indicator. The AnaeroPack systems are easy to use and performed at least as well as or better than the BBL GasPak systems for growth of anaerobic bacteria.
在厌氧产气袋(三菱瓦斯化学美国公司,纽约州纽约市)厌氧气氛生成系统中,对于所测试的103种厌氧菌中的89种(86%),厌氧产气袋罐和袋以及置于GasPak罐中的厌氧产气袋的厌氧菌生长情况被认为等同于或优于相应的GasPak罐或袋系统(贝迪微生物系统公司,马里兰州科基斯维尔)。孵育48小时后共有26处差异,孵育96小时后仍有16处差异未解决。厌氧产气袋罐和袋从未未能使厌氧指示剂变色。厌氧产气袋系统易于使用,在厌氧菌生长方面表现至少与BBL GasPak系统一样好或更好。