Garrino M G, Glupczynski Y, Degraux J, Nizet H, Delmée M
Microbiology Laboratory, University Hospital Mont-Godinne, Catholic University of Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jan;37(1):229-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.1.229-232.1999.
Seven hundred thirty-seven clinical samples from 460 patients were processed for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by a semiautomated ligase chain reaction commercial assay, the LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay (LCx assay) from Abbott Laboratories. Results were compared to those of direct microscopy and standard microbiological culture. Of 26 patients (5.7%) with a culture positive for M. tuberculosis, 22 (84.6%) were found positive by the LCx assay. The sensitivity of the LCx assay was 98% for smear-positive samples and 27% for smear-negative samples. With an overall culture positivity rate for M. tuberculosis of 8.3% (61 of 737 samples) and after resolution of discrepant results according to clinical data, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the LCx assay were 78, 100, 95, and 98%, respectively, compared to 85, 100, 100, and 98%, respectively, for culture and 67, 99, 87, and 97%, respectively, for acid-fast staining. In conclusion, the LCx assay proved satisfactory and appears to be an easy-to-use 1-day test which must be used with standard culture methods but can considerably reduce diagnosis time versus culture. However, its clinical interest appears to be limited in our population with low mycobacterial prevalence because of its cost considering the small gain in sensitivity versus direct microscopy.
对460名患者的737份临床样本进行处理,采用雅培实验室的半自动连接酶链反应商业检测法(LCx结核分枝杆菌检测法,即LCx检测法)直接检测结核分枝杆菌复合群。将结果与直接显微镜检查和标准微生物培养结果进行比较。在26例结核分枝杆菌培养阳性的患者(5.7%)中,22例(84.6%)通过LCx检测法呈阳性。LCx检测法对涂片阳性样本的敏感性为98%,对涂片阴性样本的敏感性为27%。结核分枝杆菌的总体培养阳性率为8.3%(737份样本中的61份),根据临床数据解决结果不一致的问题后,LCx检测法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78%、100%、95%和98%,相比之下,培养法的相应数值分别为85%、100%、100%和98%,抗酸染色法的相应数值分别为67%、99%、87%和97%。总之,LCx检测法证明是令人满意的,似乎是一种易于使用的1天检测方法,必须与标准培养方法一起使用,但与培养法相比可显著缩短诊断时间。然而,由于在我们这个分枝杆菌患病率较低的人群中,考虑到其成本以及与直接显微镜检查相比敏感性提高有限,其临床应用价值似乎有限。