Piersimoni C, Callegaro A, Scarparo C, Penati V, Nista D, Bornigia S, Lacchini C, Scagnelli M, Santini G, De Sio G
Department of Clinical Microbiology, General Hospital Umberto I degrees-Torrette, Ancona, Italy.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Dec;36(12):3601-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.12.3601-3604.1998.
Two commercial assays that detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) in clinical specimens by rRNA target amplification (AMTDII) and ligase chain reaction (LCx) were evaluated. The tests were applied to 457 respiratory (n = 273) and extrapulmonary (n = 184) specimens collected from 357 patients. The results were compared with those of acid-fast staining and culture. The combination of culture and clinical diagnosis was considered to be the "gold standard." Seventy specimens were from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and 28 specimens were from patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis. After resolution of discrepant results, the overall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values for respiratory specimens were 92.8, 99.4, 98.5, and 97%, respectively, for AMTDII and 75.7, 98.8, 96.4, and 90.5%, respectively, for LCx. With extrapulmonary specimens, the overall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were 78.6, 99.3, 95.6, and 96.2%, respectively, for AMTDII and 53.6, 99.3, 93.7, and 92.1%, respectively, for LCx. The level of agreement between AMTDII and LCx assay results was 78.2%. We conclude that although both nucleic acid amplification methods are rapid and specific for the detection of MTB in clinical specimens, AMTDII is significantly more sensitive than LCx with both respiratory (P = 0.005) and extrapulmonary (P = 0.048) specimens.
对两种通过rRNA靶标扩增(AMTDII)和连接酶链反应(LCx)检测临床标本中结核分枝杆菌复合群(MTB)的商业检测方法进行了评估。这些检测应用于从357名患者收集的457份呼吸道(n = 273)和肺外(n = 184)标本。将结果与抗酸染色和培养结果进行比较。培养与临床诊断的组合被视为“金标准”。70份标本来自肺结核患者,28份标本来自肺外结核患者。在解决结果差异后,AMTDII对呼吸道标本的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为92.8%、99.4%、98.5%和97%,LCx分别为75.7%、98.8%、96.4%和90.5%。对于肺外标本,AMTDII的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为78.6%、99.3%、95.6%和96.2%,LCx分别为53.6%、99.3%、93.7%和92.1%。AMTDII和LCx检测结果之间的一致性水平为78.2%。我们得出结论,虽然两种核酸扩增方法在检测临床标本中的MTB时都快速且特异,但对于呼吸道(P = 0.005)和肺外(P = 0.048)标本,AMTDII比LCx明显更敏感。