O'Carroll P W, Cahn M A, Auston I, Selden C R
Northwest Center for Public Health Practice, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
J Urban Health. 1998 Dec;75(4):785-93. doi: 10.1007/BF02344508.
Clearly, much work needs to be done to address the diverse and sometimes unique on-line information needs of public health professionals and health policy analysts. In some cases, there are needs for complex new knowledge bases created via linkages among multiple databases (e.g., public health-relevant geographic information systems). However, in many other cases, what is needed is a more systematic way of capturing the so-called grey literature: policy documents, government reports, legislative summaries, industry group publications, descriptions of best practices, and so on. In general, very little of this grey literature is formally peer reviewed, most is not available on-line, and almost none of it is accessible through such trusted databases as MEDLINE. Yet, it is frequently this practice-oriented literature that is of most importance to public health professionals and health policy analysts. New systems are needed to make this large and growing body of information accessible electronically in a well-indexed, timely, reasonably comprehensive, yet meaningfully filtered, manner. The development of such systems presents new and difficult challenges to those interested in ensuring on-line access to such information for health policy analysts and public health professionals.
显然,要满足公共卫生专业人员和卫生政策分析师多样化且有时独特的在线信息需求,还有很多工作要做。在某些情况下,需要通过多个数据库之间的链接创建复杂的新知识库(例如,与公共卫生相关的地理信息系统)。然而,在许多其他情况下,需要的是一种更系统的方式来获取所谓的灰色文献:政策文件、政府报告、立法摘要、行业组织出版物、最佳实践描述等等。一般来说,这类灰色文献很少经过正式的同行评审,大多数没有在线提供,几乎没有能通过像MEDLINE这样可靠的数据库获取的。然而,对于公共卫生专业人员和卫生政策分析师来说,往往正是这类注重实践的文献最为重要。需要新的系统,以便以索引良好、及时、合理全面且经过有意义筛选的方式,以电子方式获取这一庞大且不断增长的信息主体。对于那些有兴趣确保卫生政策分析师和公共卫生专业人员能够在线获取此类信息的人来说,开发这样的系统带来了新的难题。