Scheiman J, Isenberg J
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0362, USA.
Am J Med. 1998 Nov 2;105(5A):32S-38S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00279-4.
Coprescription of gastroprotective agents is a common practice for patients requiring nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy, although there is limited evidence that some of these agents are effective. The prostaglandin analog misoprostol and the proton pump inhibitor omeprazole appear to be efficacious in decreasing NSAID-associated ulcers. Misoprostol has also been shown to decrease NSAID-associated gastrointestinal (GI) complications by 40% compared with placebo. Despite the efficacy of these drugs, their effectiveness in the general population has not yet been adequately determined with respect to reduction of symptoms and improvement in patient quality of life. Sucralfate and bismuth appear to be largely ineffective, and histamine receptor antagonists, when given at traditional ulcer-healing doses, decrease symptoms and duodenal ulcers only. The issue of outcomes research, therefore, needs to be more fully incorporated into any analysis of the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of the widespread clinical use of such gastroprotective drugs.
对于需要非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)治疗的患者,联合开具胃保护剂是一种常见的做法,尽管仅有有限的证据表明其中一些药物是有效的。前列腺素类似物米索前列醇和质子泵抑制剂奥美拉唑似乎在减少NSAID相关溃疡方面有效。与安慰剂相比,米索前列醇还显示可将NSAID相关的胃肠道(GI)并发症减少40%。尽管这些药物有效,但在减轻症状和改善患者生活质量方面,它们在普通人群中的有效性尚未得到充分确定。硫糖铝和铋似乎基本无效,而组胺受体拮抗剂在传统溃疡愈合剂量下使用时,仅能减轻症状和减少十二指肠溃疡。因此,在对这类胃保护药物广泛临床应用的有效性或成本效益进行任何分析时,都需要更全面地纳入结果研究。