Zanchetti A, Rosei E A, Dal Palù C, Leonetti G, Magnani B, Pessina A
Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale, Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, University of Milan, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Italy.
J Hypertens. 1998 Nov;16(11):1667-76. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816110-00014.
It is unclear whether the carotid intima-media thickness can be influenced by antihypertensive treatment and whether some antihypertensive agents, such as calcium antagonists, may have a greater effect on this parameter than others, such as diuretics. The present paper reports the principal results of the ultrasound substudy of the randomized, prospective, controlled, Verapamil in Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Study (VHAS).
In 498 hypertensive patients in eight Italian centres, randomized to either verapamil (240 mg once a day) or chlorthalidone (25 mg once a day), a B-mode ultrasound scan was performed according to a standardized procedure at baseline and after 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months of treatment. The maximum intima-media thicknesses of the far walls of common, bifurcation and internal carotid arteries were measured bilaterally, and the following indices calculated: the mean thickness at the six measured sites, the mean thickness at the common and bifurcation sites and the single maximum thickness. The primary endpoint for treatment efficacy was the slope of the change over 4 years (rate of change, mm/year), corrected by using the initial mean over the six sites (baseline + 3 months) as a covariate (mm/year per mm). The patients were also classified into three strata according to their baseline single maximum thickness: those with normal carotid arteries (single maximum ( 1 mm), those with thickened carotid arteries (single maximum > 1 and < or = 1.5 mm and those with carotid plaques (single maximum > 1.5 mm).
Among the 456 patients with satisfactory baseline ultrasound readings, 33% were classified with normal carotid arteries, 27% with thickened carotid arteries and 40% with plaques. In the intention-to-treat population (377 patients with ultrasound measurements taken on at least three different occasions over a period of at least 2 years), the rate of change in the mean thickness at the six sites measured was rather small (0.015 mm/year), but significantly (P < 0.05) smaller in patients with plaques (0.003 mm/year) than in patients with thickened or with normal carotids (0.023 and 0.025 mm/year, respectively). When related to initial values, the rate of change in the mean thickness at the six sites had a negative slope (-0.059 mm/year per mm, P < 0.01). Although rates of change in the carotid intima-media thickness in unstratified patients were not different in those treated with verapamil or with chlorthalidone, when changes in the mean thickness of six sites were related to the initial value, the slope of this relationship was significantly different in the two treatment groups (verapamil -0.082 versus chlorthalidone -0.037 mm/year per mm, P < 0.02). The blood pressure-lowering effect of the two randomized treatments was similar. Taking fatal and nonfatal, major and minor cardiovascular events together, there were 19 events in the verapamil group and 35 in the chlorthalidone group, with a significantly (P < 0.01) greater incidence in patients with plaques, and among patients with plaques in those who were randomized to chlorthalidone (P < 0.05).
In accord with evidence from animal models of atherosclerosis, the calcium antagonist verapamil was more effective than the diuretic chlorthalidone in promoting regression of thicker carotid lesions. Changes in the carotid intima-media thickness were small in both groups, and the differences between the changes under the two treatments were consequently small, but the observation that these small differences in carotid wall changes were paralleled by differences in the incidence of cardiovascular events (better intima-media thickness regression with verapamil paralleled by a lower cardiovascular event rate) suggests that even small effects on carotid plaques may have clinical and prognostic relevance.
尚不清楚颈动脉内膜中层厚度是否会受到降压治疗的影响,以及某些降压药物,如钙拮抗剂,对此参数的影响是否可能比其他药物,如利尿剂,更大。本文报告了随机、前瞻性、对照的维拉帕米高血压与动脉粥样硬化研究(VHAS)超声子研究的主要结果。
在意大利8个中心的498例高血压患者中,随机分为维拉帕米组(每日240毫克)或氯噻酮组(每日25毫克),在基线以及治疗3、12、24、36和48个月后,按照标准化程序进行B型超声扫描。双侧测量颈总动脉、颈动脉分叉处和颈内动脉远侧壁的最大内膜中层厚度,并计算以下指标:六个测量部位的平均厚度、颈总动脉和分叉处的平均厚度以及单个最大厚度。治疗效果的主要终点是4年变化斜率(变化率,毫米/年),以六个部位的初始平均厚度(基线+3个月)作为协变量进行校正(毫米/年每毫米)。患者还根据其基线单个最大厚度分为三个层次:颈动脉正常者(单个最大厚度≤1毫米)、颈动脉增厚者(单个最大厚度>1且≤1.5毫米)和有颈动脉斑块者(单个最大厚度>1.5毫米)。
在456例基线超声读数满意的患者中,33%被分类为颈动脉正常,27%为颈动脉增厚,40%有斑块。在意向性治疗人群(377例在至少2年期间至少有三次不同时间进行超声测量的患者)中,六个测量部位的平均厚度变化率相当小(0.015毫米/年),但有斑块的患者(0.003毫米/年)的变化率显著(P<0.05)小于颈动脉增厚或正常的患者(分别为0.023和0.025毫米/年)。与初始值相关时,六个部位的平均厚度变化率呈负斜率(-0.059毫米/年每毫米,P<0.01)。虽然未分层患者中,接受维拉帕米或氯噻酮治疗的患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度变化率无差异,但当六个部位的平均厚度变化与初始值相关时,两个治疗组的这种关系斜率有显著差异(维拉帕米为-0.082,氯噻酮为-0.037毫米/年每毫米,P<0.02)。两种随机治疗的降压效果相似。将致命和非致命、主要和次要心血管事件合并计算,维拉帕米组有19例事件,氯噻酮组有35例事件,有斑块的患者发生率显著(P<0.01)更高,且在随机分配到氯噻酮组的有斑块患者中发生率更高(P<0.05)。
与动脉粥样硬化动物模型的证据一致,钙拮抗剂维拉帕米在促进较厚颈动脉病变消退方面比利尿剂氯噻酮更有效。两组的颈动脉内膜中层厚度变化都很小,因此两种治疗下的变化差异也很小,但观察到颈动脉壁变化的这些小差异与心血管事件发生率的差异平行(维拉帕米使内膜中层厚度更好地消退,同时心血管事件发生率更低)表明,即使对颈动脉斑块的微小影响也可能具有临床和预后意义。