• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical benefits of a consistent reduction in blood pressure.

作者信息

Mancia G, Cattaneo B M, Omboni S, Grassi G

机构信息

Cattedra di Medicina Interna I, Ospedale S. Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Universita di Milano, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Oct;16(6):S35-9.

PMID:9856382
Abstract

This paper briefly reviews the epidemiological evidence that hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor. It also summarizes the data from controlled intervention trials that show antihypertensive treatment to be accompanied by a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The inability of antihypertensive treatment to offer full protection to the hypertensive individual is then discussed, together with the therapeutic strategies to increase the benefits, particularly with respect to limiting end-organ damage and reduction of cardiovascular events. In this context, emphasis is given to the potential additional benefit conferred by control of 24-h blood pressure and to the compliance advantage of using drugs with a long duration of action. The longevity of the blood pressure lowering effect can compensate for delayed or missed drug consumption, a frequent phenomenon in the chronically treated hypertensive patient.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical benefits of a consistent reduction in blood pressure.
J Hypertens Suppl. 1998 Oct;16(6):S35-9.
2
ESH-ESC guidelines for the management of hypertension.欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)高血压管理指南
Herz. 2006 Jun;31(4):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2829-3.
3
Blood pressure variability: clinical implications and effects of antihypertensive treatment.血压变异性:临床意义及降压治疗的影响
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Jul;12(5):S35-40.
4
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the prediction of cardiovascular events and effects of chronotherapy: rationale and design of the MAPEC study.动态血压监测在预测心血管事件及时间治疗法效果中的应用:MAPEC研究的原理与设计
Chronobiol Int. 2007;24(4):749-75. doi: 10.1080/07420520701535837.
5
[Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].老年患者中难以控制的动脉高血压。“白大衣效应”的意义
Rev Port Cardiol. 1999 Oct;18(10):897-906.
6
Effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibition on end-organ protection: can we do better?肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制对靶器官保护的作用:我们能否做得更好?
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):1803-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.019.
7
Night-day blood pressure ratio and dipping pattern as predictors of death and cardiovascular events in hypertension.夜间与日间血压比值及血压波动模式作为高血压患者死亡和心血管事件的预测因素
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Oct;23(10):645-53. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.9. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
8
Blood pressure levels, risk factors and antihypertensive treatments: lessons from the SHEAF study.血压水平、危险因素与抗高血压治疗:来自SHEAF研究的经验教训。
J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Dec;15(12):841-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001280.
9
[Profile on circadian blood pressure and the influencing factors in essential hypertensive patients after treatment].[原发性高血压患者治疗后昼夜血压及影响因素分析]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Aug;25(8):710-4.
10
[Calcium antagonists in cardiovascular disease. Clinical evidence from morbidity and mortality trials].[心血管疾病中的钙拮抗剂。发病率和死亡率试验的临床证据]
Drugs. 2000;59 Spec No 2:25-37.

引用本文的文献

1
The longevity gene mIndy (I'm Not Dead, Yet) affects blood pressure through sympathoadrenal mechanisms.长寿基因 mIndy(我还没死呢)通过交感肾上腺机制影响血压。
JCI Insight. 2021 Jan 25;6(2):136083. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.136083.
2
Chronotherapeutics: are there meaningful differences among antihypertensive drugs?时辰治疗学:抗高血压药物之间存在有意义的差异吗?
Curr Hypertens Rep. 1999 Aug;1(4):320-7. doi: 10.1007/s11906-999-0040-7.
3
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the management of hypertension.高血压管理中的药物经济学考量
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 2:13-20; discussion 39-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059002-00002.