• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对儿童和青少年的指定预防性干预(二级预防)心理健康项目评估。

Evaluation of indicated preventive intervention (secondary prevention) mental health programs for children and adolescents.

作者信息

Durlak J A, Wells A M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Oct;26(5):775-802. doi: 10.1023/a:1022162015815.

DOI:10.1023/a:1022162015815
PMID:9861693
Abstract

Evaluated the outcomes of 130 indicated preventive interventions (secondary prevention) mental health programs for children and adolescents that seek to identify early signs of maladjustment and to intervene before full-blown disorders develop. Results indicate such programs significantly reduce problems and significantly increase competencies. In particular, behavioral and cognitive-behavior programs for children with subclinical disorders (mean ESs in the 0.50s) appear as effective as psychotherapy for children with established problems and more effective than attempts to prevent adolescent smoking alcohol use, and delinquency. In practical terms, the average participant receiving behavioral or cognitive-behavior intervention surpasses the performance of approximately 70% of those in a control group. Of particular interest was the high mean effect (0.72) achieved by programs targeting incipient externalizing problems which are customarily the least amenable to change via traditional psychotherapeutic efforts when they reach clinical levels. Priorities for future research include greater specification of intervention procedures, assessment of treatment implementation, more follow-up studies, and identifying how different participants respond to early intervention.

摘要

评估了130项针对儿童和青少年的指定预防干预措施(二级预防)心理健康项目,这些项目旨在识别适应不良的早期迹象,并在全面疾病发展之前进行干预。结果表明,此类项目显著减少了问题,并显著提高了能力。特别是,针对亚临床障碍儿童的行为和认知行为项目(平均效应大小在0.50左右)似乎与针对已出现问题儿童的心理治疗一样有效,并且比预防青少年吸烟、饮酒和犯罪的尝试更有效。实际上,接受行为或认知行为干预的平均参与者超过了对照组中约70%的人的表现。特别令人感兴趣的是,针对初期外化问题的项目取得了较高的平均效应(0.72),而这些问题通常在达到临床水平时最不易通过传统心理治疗努力改变。未来研究的重点包括更详细地说明干预程序、评估治疗实施情况、更多的随访研究,以及确定不同参与者对早期干预的反应。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of indicated preventive intervention (secondary prevention) mental health programs for children and adolescents.针对儿童和青少年的指定预防性干预(二级预防)心理健康项目评估。
Am J Community Psychol. 1998 Oct;26(5):775-802. doi: 10.1023/a:1022162015815.
2
Primary prevention mental health programs for children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review.针对儿童和青少年的心理健康初级预防项目:一项荟萃分析综述
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Apr;25(2):115-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1024654026646.
3
Predictors of non-drug psychiatric/psychotherapeutic treatment in children and adolescents with mental or behavioural disorders.儿童和青少年精神或行为障碍患者非药物精神科/心理治疗的预测因素。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;26(4):433-444. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0900-z. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Six-year follow-up of preventive interventions for children of divorce: a randomized controlled trial.离婚家庭子女预防性干预措施的六年随访:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1874-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1874.
5
Systematic Review of Universal Resilience-Focused Interventions Targeting Child and Adolescent Mental Health in the School Setting.系统评价:在学校环境中针对儿童和青少年心理健康的普遍注重韧性的干预措施
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;56(10):813-824. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
7
Little Treatments, Promising Effects? Meta-Analysis of Single-Session Interventions for Youth Psychiatric Problems.小治疗,大效果?单次干预治疗青少年精神问题的荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;56(2):107-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
8
Evidence-based prevention practice in mental health: what is it and how do we get there?心理健康领域基于证据的预防实践:它是什么以及我们如何实现?
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Jan;77(1):153-64. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.1.153.
9
Effectiveness of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for adolescents with serious mental illness: 12 month naturalistic follow-up study.精神分析心理治疗对患有严重精神疾病青少年的有效性:12个月自然随访研究
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009 May;43(5):467-75. doi: 10.1080/00048670902817679.
10
The Next Big Thing in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Interventions to Prevent and Intervene Early in Psychiatric Illnesses.儿童和青少年精神病学的下一件大事:预防和早期干预精神疾病的措施。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2015 Sep;38(3):475-94. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2015.05.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing whether multi-level factors protect poly-victimised children against psychopathology in early adulthood: a longitudinal cohort study.检验多层次因素是否能保护多受侵害儿童在成年早期免受精神病理学影响:一项纵向队列研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Nov 5;33:e58. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000660.
2
Oppositional defiant disorder.对立违抗障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023 Jun 22;9(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00441-6.
3
[Public mental health: Core component or side issue of public health?].[公共心理健康:公共卫生的核心组成部分还是次要问题?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Apr;66(4):356-362. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03670-y. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
Online, Group-Based Psychological Support for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Results from the Recapture Life Randomized Trial.针对青少年及青年癌症幸存者的在线群组心理支持:“重拾生活”随机试验结果
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 18;13(10):2460. doi: 10.3390/cancers13102460.
5
Gamification for Internet Gaming Disorder Prevention: Evaluation of a Wise IT-Use (WIT) Program for Hong Kong Primary Students.用于预防网络成瘾障碍的游戏化:香港小学生明智使用信息技术(WIT)计划的评估。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 1;10:2468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02468. eCollection 2019.
6
The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies.青年导师制项目的效果:成果研究的元分析。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Mar;48(3):423-443. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00982-8. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
7
The added value of a family-centered approach to optimize infants' social-emotional development: A quasi-experimental study.以家庭为中心的方法对优化婴儿社会情感发展的附加价值:一项准实验研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):e0187750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187750. eCollection 2017.
8
How reliable and valid is the teacher version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in primary school children?《长处与困难问卷》教师版用于小学生时的信度和效度如何?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 28;12(4):e0176605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176605. eCollection 2017.
9
Incremental Validity of Teacher and Parent Symptom and Impairment Ratings when Screening for Mental Health Difficulties.筛查心理健康问题时教师和家长症状及损害评分的增量效度
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 May;45(4):827-837. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0188-y.
10
The Effectiveness of the BITSEA as a Tool to Early Detect Psychosocial Problems in Toddlers, a Cluster Randomized Trial.BITSEA作为早期发现幼儿心理社会问题工具的有效性:一项整群随机试验
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 18;10(9):e0136488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136488. eCollection 2015.