Durlak J A, Wells A M
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Apr;25(2):115-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1024654026646.
Used meta-analysis to review 177 primary prevention programs designed to prevent behavioral and social problems in children and adolescents. Findings provide empirical support for further research and practice in primary prevention. Most categories of programs produced outcomes similar to or higher in magnitude than those obtained by many other established preventive and treatment interventions in the social sciences and medicine. Programs modifying the school environment, individually focused mental health promotion efforts, and attempts to help children negotiate stressful transitions yield significant mean effects ranging from 0.24 to 0.93. In practical terms, the average participant in a primary prevention program surpasses the performance of between 59% to 82% of those in a control group, and outcomes reflect an 8% to 46% difference in success rates favoring prevention groups. Most categories of programs had the dual benefit of significantly reducing problems and significantly increasing competencies. Priorities for future research include clearer specification of intervention procedures and program goals, assessment of program implementation, more follow-up studies, and determining how characteristics of the intervention and participants relate to different outcomes.
运用荟萃分析回顾了177项旨在预防儿童和青少年行为及社会问题的一级预防项目。研究结果为一级预防的进一步研究和实践提供了实证支持。大多数项目类别产生的结果在幅度上与社会科学和医学中许多其他既定的预防和治疗干预措施所获得的结果相似或更高。改善学校环境的项目、针对个人的心理健康促进努力以及帮助儿童应对压力性过渡的尝试产生了显著的平均效应,范围从0.24到0.93。实际上,一级预防项目的平均参与者超过了对照组中59%至82%的参与者的表现,结果显示成功率上有利于预防组的差异为8%至46%。大多数项目类别具有显著减少问题和显著提高能力的双重益处。未来研究的重点包括更明确地界定干预程序和项目目标、评估项目实施情况、更多的随访研究,以及确定干预措施和参与者的特征如何与不同结果相关。