Duka T, Tasker R, Stephens D N
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Behav Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;9(7):643-53. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199811000-00019.
Eighteen male social drinkers underwent four training sessions during which they ingested two colour-coded drinks (red or blue, balanced for drink type); one containing alcohol (aliquots of 0.1 g/kg) and the other placebo (aliquots of orangeade). Following the training sessions, subjects were presented with both drinks, and instructed to choose the drink they felt like consuming and to indicate their preference for their chosen drink over the other drink. In addition, they were instructed to consume the first drink but that all subsequent drinks (total of six drinks), offered at 10-min intervals, were optional. A number of trait characteristics were assessed including alcohol outcome expectancies, drinking habits and personality traits. The acute effects of alcohol on mood was also evaluated by comparing subjective ratings following alcohol and placebo during the training sessions. Of the 18 subjects, 12 chose alcohol at least once ('samplers'), whereas six never chose alcohol ('non-samplers'). Over the three sessions, however, alcohol and placebo were chosen equally. When alcohol was chosen, subjects drank significantly more than when placebo was chosen, which may be consistent with a priming effect of drinking alcohol. The amount of alcohol drunk was seen to correlate with the alcohol expectancy factor 'sociability'. Subjective reports of feeling 'alert', 'clear-headed', 'quick-witted', and 'attentive' all showed a main effect of choosing behaviour (i.e. 'samplers'/'non-samplers'). Further analysis indicated that this effect was due to 'samplers' reporting increased subjective ratings of these mood states following the ingestion of alcohol compared to 'non-samplers'. These increased subjective ratings were also positively correlated with the amount of alcohol consumed by the subjects during the choice procedure. No other relationships were found between the amount of alcohol consumed and any of the other state or trait measures. These data suggest that social drinkers who sample alcohol in a laboratory setting can be primed by alcohol to consume more. The results also indicated that the amount drunk was related to the degree to which subjects expected alcohol to increase sociability and to reports of subjective stimulant effects of alcohol (e.g., 'alert', 'clear-headed', 'quick-witted', and 'attentive').
18名男性社交饮酒者接受了4次训练,在此期间他们摄入了两种有颜色编码的饮料(红色或蓝色,饮料类型均衡);一种含有酒精(剂量为0.1 g/kg),另一种是安慰剂(橙汁剂量)。训练结束后,向受试者提供这两种饮料,并指示他们选择自己想喝的饮料,并表明他们对所选饮料相对于另一种饮料的偏好。此外,他们被指示饮用第一杯饮料,但随后每隔10分钟提供的所有后续饮料(总共6杯)可自行选择。评估了一些特质特征,包括酒精结果预期、饮酒习惯和人格特质。还通过比较训练期间饮用酒精和安慰剂后的主观评分,评估了酒精对情绪的急性影响。在这18名受试者中,12人至少选择过一次酒精饮料(“采样者”),而6人从未选择过酒精饮料(“非采样者”)。然而,在这三次训练中,酒精饮料和安慰剂的选择次数相同。当选择酒精饮料时,受试者的饮用量明显多于选择安慰剂时,这可能与饮酒的启动效应一致。饮酒量与酒精预期因素“社交性”相关。关于感觉“警觉”“头脑清醒”“思维敏捷”和“专注”的主观报告均显示出选择行为(即“采样者”/“非采样者”)的主要影响。进一步分析表明,这种影响是由于“采样者”报告称,与“非采样者”相比,摄入酒精后这些情绪状态的主观评分有所增加。这些增加的主观评分也与受试者在选择过程中饮用的酒精量呈正相关。在饮酒量与任何其他状态或特质测量之间未发现其他关系。这些数据表明,在实验室环境中采样酒精饮料的社交饮酒者会受到酒精的启动作用而饮用更多。结果还表明,饮酒量与受试者预期酒精会增强社交性的程度以及酒精主观刺激作用的报告(如“警觉”“头脑清醒”“思维敏捷”和“专注”)有关。