Egeblad H, Andersen K, Hartiala J, Lindgren A, Marttila R, Petersen P, Roijer A, Russell D, Wranne B
Department of Cardiology B, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Scand Cardiovasc J. 1998;32(6):323-42. doi: 10.1080/14017439850139780.
The ability of echocardiography to diagnose sources of embolism and the role of the examination in the prediction of thromboembolism are reviewed. In addition, the yield of transthoracic (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is analysed in patients with suspected embolism and guidelines are proposed for performing echocardiography in this setting. In general, echocardiography is reliable for diagnosing sources of embolism and this applies in particular to TEE in the case of atrial, valvular, and aortic abnormalities. However, the method is useful for predicting embolism in a few cases only. There is a substantial risk in the event of mobile or protruding thrombi, but screening for these and other markers of thromboembolism seems to be unproductive in most groups of risk patients. Yet, in the presence of atrial fibrillation, echocardiography may be helpful in defining patients with an otherwise normal heart and low risk of embolism--and in defining the relatively rare patient with a clinically low-risk profile but moderate-to-severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and a high risk of embolism. TEE-guided conversion of atrial fibrillation without weeks of preceding anticoagulation may prove useful, after further investigation. The risk of embolism in relation to the size and mobility of valvular vegetations has remained controversial. In patients with suspected recent embolism, TTE results in less than 5% new therapeutic consequences. In those with a normal TTE, the yield of TEE seems to be equally low. We therefore recommend a selective strategy: TTE and TEE can be omitted when a cardiac source of embolism appears from the clinical setting and in most patients with an obvious predisposition to cerebrovascular disease. However, in the latter cases TTE should be performed if indicated by the clinical situation, e.g. in the presence of fever and murmur. TTE is also recommended when there are no obvious markers of primary vascular disease. To preclude very rare sources of embolism (e.g. atrial thrombi despite sinus rhythm), supplementary TEE is recommended in younger patients in whom primary vascular disease is very unlikely. The diagnosis by TEE of common conditions such as atrial septal aneurysms and patent foramen ovale cannot, however, be taken as proof of the mechanism of a systemic arterial occlusive event; thus it is difficult to change therapy on the basis of such diagnoses.
本文回顾了超声心动图诊断栓塞源的能力以及该检查在预测血栓栓塞方面的作用。此外,还分析了经胸超声心动图(TTE)和经食管超声心动图(TEE)在疑似栓塞患者中的诊断价值,并提出了在此情况下进行超声心动图检查的指南。一般来说,超声心动图在诊断栓塞源方面是可靠的,这尤其适用于存在心房、瓣膜和主动脉异常时的TEE检查。然而,该方法仅在少数情况下有助于预测栓塞。存在活动或突出的血栓时风险很大,但在大多数风险患者群体中筛查这些及其他血栓栓塞标志物似乎并无成效。然而,在存在心房颤动的情况下,超声心动图可能有助于确定心脏正常且栓塞风险低的患者,以及确定临床上风险较低但存在中度至重度左心室收缩功能障碍且栓塞风险高的相对罕见患者。经进一步研究后,TEE引导下在无数周抗凝治疗的情况下将心房颤动转复可能被证明是有用的。瓣膜赘生物的大小和活动度与栓塞风险的关系仍存在争议。在疑似近期栓塞的患者中,TTE导致不到5%的新治疗结果。在TTE正常的患者中,TEE的诊断价值似乎同样较低。因此,我们推荐一种选择性策略:当从临床情况可判断存在心脏栓塞源时,以及在大多数明显易患脑血管疾病的患者中,可省略TTE和TEE检查。然而,在后一种情况下,如果临床情况有指征,如存在发热和杂音,则应进行TTE检查。当没有明显的原发性血管疾病标志物时,也推荐进行TTE检查。为排除非常罕见的栓塞源(如窦性心律时的心房血栓),对于极不可能患有原发性血管疾病的年轻患者,建议补充TEE检查。然而,TEE诊断常见情况如房间隔瘤和卵圆孔未闭,不能作为全身性动脉闭塞事件机制的证据;因此,很难基于此类诊断改变治疗方案。