Hollander J E, Singer A J
Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-4283, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;5(10):1012-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02782.x.
To evaluate the 3-month cosmetic outcome following laceration repair with a new tissue adhesive, 2-octylcyanoacrylate, as a function of physician experience with this tissue adhesive.
The authors prospectively enrolled consecutive patients >1 year of age with non-bite, non-crush-induced lacerations who presented <6 hours after injury and were treated with 2-octylcyanoacrylate. Structured closed-question data sheets were completed at the time of laceration repair and at 3-month follow-up. Long-term cosmetic appearance (>3 months) was assessed by patients using a 100-mm visual analog scale. The cosmetic outcomes were evaluated as a function of the physician application using ANOVA or chi2 tests, as appropriate. This study had 80% power to detect a 10-mm difference between the 2-octylcyanoacrylate and suture groups (alpha, 0.05).
Seven physicians applied 2-octylcyanoacrylate to 63 patients; 61 patients received sutures. Patients were similar in the 2 groups (age, gender, race, history, and wound characteristics; p > 0.05 for all). At long-term follow-up, the cosmetic outcomes were similar in the 2-octylcyanoacrylate and suture groups according to patients (VAS 83.8 +/- 19.4 mm vs 82.5 +/- 17.6 mm; p = 0.72) and physicians (optimal score, 77% vs 80%; p = 0.67), and independent of physician experience with the 2-octylcyanoacrylate. One wound developed an infection and one wound necessitated reclosure due to dehiscence. Neither occurred with the first application.
The 3-month cosmetic appearance of wounds treated with 2-octylcyanoacrylate is equivalent to that with sutures and does not improve as physicians become more experienced with use of this tissue adhesive. These data suggest that physicians can develop competence in application of tissue adhesives with a brief training period.
评估使用新型组织粘合剂2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯进行裂伤修复后3个月的美容效果,并将其作为医生使用这种组织粘合剂经验的函数。
作者前瞻性地纳入了年龄大于1岁、因非咬伤、非挤压伤导致裂伤且受伤后6小时内就诊并接受2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯治疗的连续患者。在裂伤修复时和3个月随访时完成结构化的封闭式问题数据表。患者使用100毫米视觉模拟量表评估长期美容外观(>3个月)。根据情况,使用方差分析或卡方检验将美容效果作为医生应用情况的函数进行评估。本研究有80%的把握度检测出2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯组和缝线组之间10毫米的差异(α,0.05)。
7名医生为63名患者应用了2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯;61名患者接受了缝线治疗。两组患者在年龄、性别、种族、病史和伤口特征方面相似(所有p>0.05)。在长期随访中,根据患者(视觉模拟量表评分83.8±19.4毫米对82.5±17.6毫米;p=0.72)和医生(最佳评分,77%对80%;p=0.67)评估,2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯组和缝线组的美容效果相似,且与医生使用2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯的经验无关。有1处伤口发生感染,1处伤口因裂开需要再次缝合。首次应用时均未出现这种情况。
用2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯治疗的伤口3个月后的美容外观与用缝线治疗的伤口相当,并且不会随着医生使用这种组织粘合剂经验的增加而改善。这些数据表明,医生经过短暂的培训期就能掌握应用组织粘合剂的技能。