Suppr超能文献

熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性肝硬化的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in primary biliary cirrhosis.

作者信息

Pasha T, Heathcote J, Gabriel S, Cauch-Dudek K, Jorgensen R, Therneau T, Dickson E R, Lindor K D

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester 55905, MN, USA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 1999 Jan;29(1):21-6. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290116.

Abstract

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but the cost of this drug has raised concerns regarding cost-effectiveness. The aim of our study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of UDCA in PBC. We compared the costs and outcomes of managing PBC patients with and without UDCA. From two previously published trials, the effectiveness of UDCA was determined by comparing the annual reduction in the development of ascites, varices, variceal bleeding, encephalopathy, liver transplantation, and death between the treatment groups. Average annual costs for each of these events were estimated based on literature and institutional data. Approximately twice as many major events occurred in the placebo group compared with the UDCA group. The relative risk (RR) of liver transplantation (1.95; 95% CI: 1.14-3.68) and development of esophageal varices (3. 11; 95% CI: 1.57-10.65) were significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the UDCA group. There were no significant increases in the RR of ascites, variceal bleeding, encephalopathy, or death between the two groups. Based on the estimated annual cost of managing these events and the annual costs of UDCA ($2,500), there was an annual cost savings per patient of $1,372. Compared with the placebo group, patients receiving UDCA had a lower incidence of major complications and lower medical care costs.

摘要

熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)是治疗原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者的一种安全有效的药物,但该药物的成本引发了对成本效益的担忧。我们研究的目的是确定UDCA治疗PBC的成本效益。我们比较了使用和不使用UDCA治疗PBC患者的成本和结果。从之前发表的两项试验中,通过比较治疗组之间腹水、静脉曲张、静脉曲张出血、肝性脑病、肝移植和死亡发生率的年度降低情况来确定UDCA的有效性。基于文献和机构数据估算了这些事件中每一项的平均年度成本。与UDCA组相比,安慰剂组发生的重大事件大约是其两倍。与UDCA组相比,安慰剂组肝移植的相对风险(RR)(1.95;95%可信区间:1.14 - 3.68)和食管静脉曲张发生的相对风险(3.11;95%可信区间:1.57 - 10.65)显著更高。两组之间腹水、静脉曲张出血、肝性脑病或死亡的相对风险没有显著增加。根据管理这些事件的估计年度成本和UDCA的年度成本(2500美元),每位患者每年节省成本1372美元。与安慰剂组相比,接受UDCA治疗的患者主要并发症发生率更低,医疗护理成本也更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验