Suppr超能文献

["健康教育干预项目“健康学校”的效果评估"]

[Evaluation of the effect of the health education intervention project "Healthy School"].

作者信息

Zivković M, Bjegović V, Vuković D, Marinković J

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine, Statistics and Health Research, University School of Medicine, Belgrade.

出版信息

Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 May-Jun;126(5-6):164-70.

PMID:9863375
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Contemporary health-education intervention programs are increasingly used as a tool for improving health of school children [1-4]. Since 1992 a Network of 13 elementary Health Promoting Schools established in Yugoslavia (though not yet admitted to the European Network) has been operational. The Project was approved by the Ministries of Health, Education and Ecology from the very beginning, and financially supported by the Government of Serbia since 1995. The team of up to 40 health professionals, school principals and school project managers worked together for four years to change the working conditions in schools knowledge, attitudes and behaviour of school children and staff in order to improve their health [5]. The goal of this paper is to present results of health education intervention in changing of hygienic conditions in schools, as well as some of the attitudes, behaviour and knowledge of pupils and their parents.

METHOD

The study took place before and after the intervention--at two points in time--during 1993 and 1996. The tri-angular approach including (1) pupils, (2) schools (teachers, school environment), and (3) parents, was used. A random pretest and post-test study design with control group (12 experimental and two control schools) has been implemented. The multiphase cluster sample was employed in order to represent all of the country typical regions. Six types of especially designed questionnaires were used to provide comparable variables in the sample of pupils, their parents and teachers. Exception were 1st-graders and 4th-graders for whom information were gathered by means of a "draw-and-write" investigation technique [6]. The response rate was 88.70% before and 98.28% after intervention. Data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS/PC software.

RESULTS

Schools are somewhat less overcrowded, much cleaner and better maintained after the four-year intervention. Toilets are in a better condition, but there is still much more to be done. The 1st- and 4th-graders, surveyed by the draw-and-write method, mentioned numerous ways of keeping and improving health, which were summarized as fifteen health-improvement measures (Graph 1). The most frequently mentioned measures were nutrition, physical activity, general hygiene, oral and dental hygiene, sleeping and fresh air. Each of these measures was mentioned by over 20% of the surveyed pupils. Eleven of 15 variables showed significant increase in frequencies (at the level of at least p < 0.01) after the intervention. As an indicator of a nutrition behaviour, the regularity of main meals is analyzed (Graph 2). The majority of children eat regularly and the difference before and after intervention is significant only for the school meal (c2 = 30.715, p < 0.001). Although over 70% of children learn that general hygiene is good for health in junior graders, only about little more than 30% of senior graders have a bath or shower every day, while others only once or twice a week. The differences are significant before and after the intervention (c2 = 10.648, p < 0.05) only for everyday practice. More than 90% of senior-grade pupils brush their teeth at least once or several times a day. Over 60% of children in our survey go in for sport, whereas about 20% never do so. It seems that the intervention contributed symbolically to this practice important for health, though before-after difference is significant (c2 = 6.673, p < 0.05). However, in the control group schools children have much less physical activity in 1996, and this difference is significant (c2 = 14.070, p < 0.010). The psycho-emotional status of Yugoslav young people is strongly influenced by the situation in the country the war, the economic disaster and the impact of international sanctions. Consequently, more than one-fourth of the children complained of frequent exhaustion and concentration problems, which their parents also noticed. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

未标注

当代健康教育干预项目越来越多地被用作改善学童健康的工具[1 - 4]。自1992年以来,南斯拉夫建立了一个由13所小学组成的健康促进学校网络(尽管尚未被欧洲网络接纳)并开始运作。该项目从一开始就得到了卫生、教育和生态部的批准,自1995年起由塞尔维亚政府提供财政支持。由多达40名健康专业人员、学校校长和学校项目经理组成的团队共同工作了四年,以改变学校的工作条件、学童和教职员工的知识、态度和行为,从而改善他们的健康状况[5]。本文的目的是展示健康教育干预在改变学校卫生条件方面的结果,以及学生及其家长的一些态度、行为和知识。

方法

该研究在干预前后进行——在1993年和1996年的两个时间点。采用了三角法,包括(1)学生,(2)学校(教师、学校环境)和(3)家长。实施了带有对照组(12所实验学校和2所对照学校)的随机预测试和后测试研究设计。采用多阶段整群抽样以代表该国所有典型地区。使用了六种特别设计的问卷,以便在学生、他们的家长和教师样本中提供可比变量。一年级和四年级学生除外,他们的信息是通过“画写”调查技术收集的[6]。干预前的回复率为88.70%,干预后的回复率为98.28%。使用SPSS/PC软件通过描述性和推断性统计对数据进行分析。

结果

经过四年的干预,学校的拥挤程度有所降低,更加清洁且维护得更好。厕所状况有所改善,但仍有许多工作要做。通过画写方法调查的一年级和四年级学生提到了许多保持和改善健康的方法,这些方法被总结为十五项健康改善措施(图1)。最常提到的措施是营养、体育活动、一般卫生、口腔和牙齿卫生、睡眠和新鲜空气。这些措施中的每一项都被超过20%的受访学生提到。15个变量中有11个在干预后频率显著增加(至少在p < 0.01的水平)。作为营养行为的一个指标,分析了主餐的规律性(图2)。大多数孩子饮食规律,干预前后的差异仅在学校餐方面显著(c2 = 30.7, p < 0.001)。尽管超过70%的低年级学生知道一般卫生对健康有益,但只有略多于30%的高年级学生每天洗澡,而其他学生每周只洗一两次。干预前后的差异仅在日常实践方面显著(c2 = 10.648, p < 0.05)。超过90%的高年级学生每天至少刷牙一次或几次。我们调查中超过60%的孩子参加体育活动,而约20%的孩子从不参加。似乎干预对这种对健康很重要的行为有一定推动作用,尽管干预前后的差异显著(c2 = 6.673, p < 0.05)。然而,对照组学校的孩子在1996年体育活动少得多,这种差异显著(c2 = 14.070, p < 0.010)。南斯拉夫年轻人的心理情绪状况受到该国局势——战争、经济灾难和国际制裁影响的强烈影响。因此,超过四分之一的孩子抱怨经常疲惫和注意力不集中问题,他们的父母也注意到了这些问题。(摘要截断)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验