Smith L L, Reise S P
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Los Angeles, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Nov;75(5):1350-62. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.5.1350.
Item response theory methods were used to study differential item functioning (DIF) between gender groups on a measure of stress reaction. Results revealed that women were more likely to endorse items describing emotional vulnerability and sensitivity, whereas men were more likely to endorse items describing tension, irritability, and being easily upset. Item factor analysis yielded 5 correlated factors, and the DIF analysis, in turn, revealed differential gender mean differences on these factors. This finding illustrates how even in an essentially unidimensional scale, comparison of group mean differences can be affected by multidimensionality caused by item clusters that share similar content. Results do not support arguments that measures of negative affective dispositions "artificially" produce gender mean differences by focusing on specific selected content areas.
采用项目反应理论方法研究了压力反应量表中不同性别群体之间的项目功能差异(DIF)。结果显示,女性更倾向于认可描述情绪脆弱性和敏感性的项目,而男性则更倾向于认可描述紧张、易怒和容易心烦意乱的项目。项目因素分析产生了5个相关因素,而DIF分析反过来揭示了这些因素上不同的性别均值差异。这一发现表明,即使在一个本质上是单维的量表中,组均值差异的比较也可能受到由具有相似内容的项目簇所导致的多维性的影响。结果不支持这样的观点,即负面情感倾向的测量通过关注特定选定的内容领域“人为地”产生性别均值差异。