Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚压力测量:全国样本中感知压力量表(PSS-14)的验证。

Measuring stress in Australia: validation of the perceived stress scale (PSS-14) in a national sample.

机构信息

Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, AHMS Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Department of Psychology, The University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Apr 15;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01343-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Australia, the stress levels have increased over the years, impacting on the physical and mental health of the general population. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the PSS-14 in an Australian population.

METHODS

The PSS-14 was applied to a large national sample comprising 3857 Australians in the population-based cross-sectional study Australia's National Survey of Adult Oral Health 2004-2006. The psychometric properties analyzed with the Rasch model and Graphical Log-linear Rasch models were: model fit, item fit, local dependence, differential item functioning, unidimensionality, reliability, targeting and criterion validity.

RESULTS

The PSS-14 did not fit the pure RM (χ2 (55) = 3828.3, p = < 0.001) and the unidimensionality of the whole scale was rejected (p = < 0.001). The Perceived Stress (χ2 (27) = 1409.7, p = < 0.001) and Perceived Control (χ2 (27) = 713.4, p = < 0.001) subscales did not fit the pure RM. After the deletion of two items, the Perceived Stress subscale (χ2 (96) = 94.4, p = 0.440) fitted a GLLRM, while the Perceived Control scale (χ2 (55) = 62.50, p = 0.224) fitted a GLLRM after the exclusion of four misfitting items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Perceived Stress subscale displayed adequate psychometric properties after the deletion of two items; however, the majority of problems centered around the Perceived Control subscale. The presence of differential item functioning among four items indicates that adjustment of total scores is required to avoid measurement bias. Recommendations for future applications in Australia are provided.

摘要

背景

在澳大利亚,多年来人们的压力水平不断上升,影响了普通民众的身心健康。本研究旨在评估 PSS-14 在澳大利亚人群中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

在基于人群的横断面研究澳大利亚全国成人口腔健康调查 2004-2006 中,对包括 3857 名澳大利亚人在内的大型全国样本应用 PSS-14。采用 Rasch 模型和图形对数线性 Rasch 模型分析心理测量学特性:模型拟合、项目拟合、局部依赖、项目间差异功能、单维性、信度、目标和标准效度。

结果

PSS-14 不符合纯 RM(χ2(55)=3828.3,p<0.001),整个量表的一维性被拒绝(p<0.001)。感知压力(χ2(27)=1409.7,p<0.001)和感知控制(χ2(27)=713.4,p<0.001)分量表不符合纯 RM。删除两个项目后,感知压力分量表(χ2(96)=94.4,p=0.440)符合 GLLRM,而感知控制量表(χ2(55)=62.50,p=0.224)在排除四个拟合不良的项目后符合 GLLRM。

结论

删除两个项目后,感知压力分量表表现出足够的心理测量学特性;然而,大多数问题集中在感知控制分量表上。四个项目之间存在项目间差异功能,表明需要调整总分以避免测量偏差。为澳大利亚未来的应用提供了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验