Bussmann J B, Stam H J
Institute of Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Clin Rehabil. 1998 Dec;12(6):455-64. doi: 10.1191/026921598674267844.
Mobility is an important construct in rehabilitation; many instruments have emerged which measure or assess (aspects of) mobility. In the selection or development of an appropriate technique, knowledge about the fundamentals of rehabilitation medicine is needed, as well as about essential characteristics of techniques and fundamental differences between them. The aim of this paper is to classify, assess and discuss current techniques which are or can be used to measure aspects of mobility.
Eight techniques (physical science techniques, clinimetry, observation, diaries, questionnaires, actigraphy, physiological techniques and activity monitors) are classified, assessed and discussed, based on the level of outcome measures, the aspect of mobility they measure, and methodological and practical criteria.
Rehabilitation medicine has a particular need for instruments that enable measurement of outcome measures on the level of activity and role fulfillment. Techniques differ in the type and number of mobility aspects they measure. Furthermore, important differences exist based on methodological and practical criteria. One optimal technique does not exist: the choice of a technique always depends on a complexity of factors, such as clinical problem, research questions, the mobility aspect of interest, required methodological strength, costs and availability.
活动能力是康复领域的一个重要概念;现已出现许多用于测量或评估(活动能力的)各个方面的工具。在选择或开发合适的技术时,需要了解康复医学的基本原理,以及各项技术的基本特征及其之间的根本差异。本文旨在对当前可用于测量活动能力各方面的技术进行分类、评估和讨论。
基于结果测量水平、所测量的活动能力方面以及方法学和实际标准,对八项技术(物理科学技术、临床测量法、观察法、日记法、问卷调查法、活动记录法、生理技术和活动监测器)进行分类、评估和讨论。
康复医学特别需要能够在活动水平和角色履行层面测量结果的工具。各项技术在所测量的活动能力方面的类型和数量上存在差异。此外,在方法学和实际标准方面也存在重要差异。不存在一种最佳技术:技术的选择始终取决于多种因素的综合考量,如临床问题、研究问题、感兴趣的活动能力方面、所需的方法学强度、成本和可用性。