Pace J N, Maquilan M, Hessen S E, Khoury P A, Wilson A, Kutalek S P
Cardiac Electrophysiology Laboratory of MCP-Hahnemann School of Medicine, Allegheny University Hospitals, Hahnemann Division, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1997 Dec;1(4):271-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1009724908464.
Patients (pts) may present for lead extraction with symptomatic or asymptomatic subclavian vein or superior vena cava thrombosis. Replacement of permanent pacemaker leads (PPLs) in these pts may be difficult and may require accessing a new site. We examined the utility of replacing PPLs through completely occluded vessels using extraction sheaths as conduits through the total occlusion. Over six years, a total of 210 atrial and/or ventricular PPLs were extracted from 137 pts. Two pts presented with angiographically documented thrombotic occlusion of the subclavian vein. One additional pt. who had presented with a superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, had a totally occluded innominate vein and SVC occlusion. Balloon venoplasty was used as an adjunct to dilate the SVC. In all pts, after PPLs were removed via a subclavian extraction sheath through the occluded vessel, the retained sheath was used to place a guide wire, then a peel away dilating sheath, to insert new PPLs, in each case on the side of total venous occlusion. Seven PPLs and two lead fragments were extracted, and five new PPLs replaced, ipsilateral to the venous occlusion. These data show that extraction of PPLs through thrombosed veins may be performed successfully and may not require replacing the leads through a new site. This technique spares the pt the need to access the opposite subclavian vein, and it avoids an excessive number of PPLs in the subclavian vein and SVC. The procedure illustrates an efficient means to reintroduce new PPLs with the potential to reduce associated morbidity, since repeat puncture of the subclavian vein is not required. Safety of the procedure as a whole must be considered with regard to the known risks of lead extraction, some complications of which may be substantial using current techniques.
患者可能因有症状或无症状的锁骨下静脉或上腔静脉血栓形成而前来进行导线拔除。在这些患者中更换永久性起搏器导线(PPL)可能很困难,可能需要选择一个新的部位。我们研究了使用拔除鞘作为穿过完全闭塞血管的导管来更换PPL的效用。在六年多的时间里,共从137例患者中拔除了210根心房和/或心室PPL。有2例患者经血管造影证实锁骨下静脉血栓形成闭塞。另有1例曾出现上腔静脉(SVC)综合征的患者,无名静脉完全闭塞且SVC闭塞。球囊血管成形术被用作扩张SVC的辅助手段。在所有患者中,通过锁骨下拔除鞘经闭塞血管拔除PPL后,保留的鞘用于置入导丝,然后置入剥脱扩张鞘,以插入新的PPL,每种情况均在静脉完全闭塞的一侧进行。在静脉闭塞同侧拔除了7根PPL和2个导线碎片,并更换了5根新的PPL。这些数据表明,通过血栓形成的静脉成功拔除PPL是可行的,可能不需要通过新的部位更换导线。该技术使患者无需穿刺对侧锁骨下静脉,并且避免了锁骨下静脉和SVC中过多的PPL。该手术说明了一种重新引入新PPL的有效方法,有可能降低相关的发病率,因为不需要重复穿刺锁骨下静脉。必须考虑整个手术的安全性以及已知的导线拔除风险,使用当前技术,其中一些并发症可能很严重。