Engström M, Jonsson L, Grindlund M, Stålberg E
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Uppsala University, Akademiska sjukhuset, Sweden.
Acta Otolaryngol. 1998 Nov;118(6):783-9. doi: 10.1080/00016489850182440.
The results of House Brackmann and Yanagihara grading were compared with electroneurographic (ENoG) data in 30 consecutive patients with Bell's palsy. The examinations were made on mean days 11, 36 and 99. Twenty-four patients had a favourable outcome (Yanagihara > or = 36 at three months). Based on our observations, 23 (96%) of these could have been predicted by ENoG, 18 (75%) by Yanagihara grading and 6 (25%) by House Brackmann grading. Initially, the relative House Brackmann scores showed a slightly milder palsy than the Yanagihara scores, but in the follow-up period the gradings were almost identical. The mild palsies, defined on the initial ENoG results, initially demonstrated relatively less nerve dysfunction on ENoG than the clinical grading; by the first follow-up, the ENoG and clinical grading had both returned to normal. The intermediate palsies had almost the same initial relative clinical and ENoG values, but at the first follow-up (mean day 36), the facial function had returned to normal despite abnormally reduced, but improved, ENoG values. In the severely affected patients, the follow-up studies showed an improved clinical function but ENoG values still demonstrated a high degree of degeneration (slightly improved at second follow-up). In this study, patients with a favourable outcome were best predicted with ENoG. Clinical identification of these patients was more accurate with Yanagihara than with House Brackmann. Furthermore, in all three groups a clinical improvement, due to the release of neurapraxia, was noted at the first follow-up. The slow ENoG improvement noted at follow-up was probably due to nerve regeneration by collateral sprouting. Based on the time course of our ENoG findings, it appears that patients with a high degree of degeneration at both the initial examination and first follow-up have a poorer prognosis.
对30例连续性贝尔面瘫患者的House Brackmann分级和柳原分级结果与神经电图(ENoG)数据进行了比较。检查分别在平均第11天、36天和99天进行。24例患者预后良好(三个月时柳原分级≥36级)。根据我们的观察,其中23例(96%)可通过ENoG预测,18例(75%)可通过柳原分级预测,6例(25%)可通过House Brackmann分级预测。最初,House Brackmann相对评分显示的面瘫程度略轻于柳原评分,但在随访期,两种分级几乎相同。根据最初的ENoG结果定义的轻度面瘫,最初在ENoG上显示的神经功能障碍相对临床分级较少;到首次随访时,ENoG和临床分级均恢复正常。中度面瘫最初的相对临床和ENoG值几乎相同,但在首次随访(平均第36天)时,尽管ENoG值异常降低但有所改善,面部功能已恢复正常。在重度受累患者中,随访研究显示临床功能有所改善,但ENoG值仍显示高度变性(在第二次随访时略有改善)。在本研究中,ENoG对预后良好的患者预测效果最佳。柳原分级对这些患者的临床识别比House Brackmann分级更准确。此外,在所有三组中,首次随访时均注意到因神经失用症缓解而出现的临床改善。随访时ENoG改善缓慢可能是由于侧支发芽导致的神经再生。根据我们ENoG结果的时间进程,似乎在初次检查和首次随访时均有高度变性的患者预后较差。