Berg Thomas, Jonsson Lars, Engström Mats
Department of Surgical Sciences, Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):1020-6. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200411000-00027.
To assess the agreement between the Sunnybrook facial nerve grading system and the House-Brackmann and Yanagihara systems.
Prospective clinical facial nerve grading.
Tertiary referral center.
One-hundred assessments, 94 in patients with Bell's palsy and 6 with herpes zoster.
Diagnostic.
Evaluation according to the weighted regional Sunnybrook system, the gross House-Brackmann system, and the unweighted regional Yanagihara system. Weighted kappa statistics was used to measure agreement between the grading systems.
The average weighted kappa value between the Sunny-brook, House-Brackmann, and Yanagihara grading systems was 0.65; kappa values increased temporally (but not statistically significantly) up to day 180. The highest agreement value, 0.72, was found between the Sunnybrook and Yanagihara grading systems. The weighted kappa value between the Sunnybrook and House-Brackmann systems was 0.59. In Sunnybrook gradings less than 63, there was an overlap between House-Brackmann scores of III to VI. Reliable conversion tables between the gross House-Brackmann system and the regional Sunnybrook and Yanagihara systems could not be established.
The Sunnybrook system scores at the same agreement level as the House-Brackmann and Yanagihara grading systems. There is an evaluative difference between the weighted regional Sunnybrook and the gross House-Brackmann systems. Substantial agreement was found between the regional Sunnybrook and Yanagihara scales. Sunnybrook grading is easy and quick. By adding objective measurements and additional secondary defects, the Sunnybrook system can be an alternative to the other predominating grading systems.
评估桑尼布鲁克面神经分级系统与豪斯-布拉克曼及柳原系统之间的一致性。
前瞻性临床面神经分级。
三级转诊中心。
共进行了100次评估,其中94例为贝尔面瘫患者,6例为带状疱疹患者。
诊断性评估。
根据加权区域桑尼布鲁克系统、总体豪斯-布拉克曼系统和非加权区域柳原系统进行评估。采用加权kappa统计量来衡量分级系统之间的一致性。
桑尼布鲁克、豪斯-布拉克曼和柳原分级系统之间的平均加权kappa值为0.65;kappa值在第180天之前呈上升趋势(但无统计学显著性)。桑尼布鲁克和柳原分级系统之间的一致性值最高,为0.72。桑尼布鲁克和豪斯-布拉克曼系统之间的加权kappa值为0.59。在桑尼布鲁克分级低于63分时,豪斯-布拉克曼评分III至VI级之间存在重叠。无法建立总体豪斯-布拉克曼系统与区域桑尼布鲁克和柳原系统之间可靠的转换表。
桑尼布鲁克系统的评分与豪斯-布拉克曼及柳原分级系统处于相同的一致性水平。加权区域桑尼布鲁克系统与总体豪斯-布拉克曼系统之间存在评估差异。区域桑尼布鲁克和柳原量表之间存在高度一致性。桑尼布鲁克分级简便快捷。通过增加客观测量和其他次要缺陷,桑尼布鲁克系统可以成为其他主要分级系统的替代方案。