Suppr超能文献

截然不同的两个世界:宗教与伦理。

Two worlds apart: religion and ethics.

作者信息

Savulescu J

机构信息

Murdoch Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):382-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.382.

Abstract

In a recent article entitled, Requests "for inappropriate" treatment based on religious beliefs, Orr and Genesen claim that futile treatment should be provided to patients who request it if their request is based on a religious belief. I claim that this implies that we should also accede to requests for harmful or cost-ineffective treatments based on religious beliefs. This special treatment of religious requests is an example of special pleading on the part of theists and morally objectionable discrimination against atheists. It also provides an excellent illustration of how different the practices of religion and ethics are.

摘要

在最近一篇题为《基于宗教信仰的“不适当”治疗请求》的文章中,奥尔和格森声称,如果患者基于宗教信仰提出请求,就应该为其提供无效治疗。我认为,这意味着我们也应该同意基于宗教信仰提出的有害或成本效益不佳的治疗请求。对宗教请求的这种特殊对待是有神论者的特殊诉求,也是对无神论者在道德上令人反感的歧视。它还很好地说明了宗教实践与伦理实践有多么不同。

相似文献

1
Two worlds apart: religion and ethics.截然不同的两个世界:宗教与伦理。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):382-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.382.

引用本文的文献

1
Whose harm? Which metaphysic?谁的伤害?哪种形而上学?
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Feb;40(1):43-61. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09480-1.
4
5
Against culturally sensitive bioethics.反对具有文化敏感性的生物伦理学。
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):647-52. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9504-2.
6
Conscientious objection in medicine.医学中的良心拒斥。
BMJ. 2006 Feb 4;332(7536):294-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7536.294.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验