Zhang K, Chuluyan H E, Hardie D, Shen D C, Larsen R, Issekutz A
Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Hybridoma. 1998 Oct;17(5):445-56. doi: 10.1089/hyb.1998.17.445.
Four newly developed monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) are characterized using flowcytometry, enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA), immunoprecipitation and Western blots, carbohydrate epitope mapping, glycosidase cleavage, and competition binding assays. Their effects on selectin binding to myeloid cells was tested. These MAbs react only with myeloid cells. MAbs CI-1, BU60, and HIM95 recognize epitopes expressed by CD11/CD18 (beta2) integrins, while HI247 and CSLEX1 do not. The epitopes require Lewis x [Galbeta1-4 (Fucalpha1-3)GlcNAc] based on reactivity with oligosaccharide-polyacrylamide-biotin or oligosaccharide-BSA conjugates. MAb HI247 recognizes a related structure, sialyl-Lewis x, NeuAcalpha2-3GaLbeta1-4(Fucalpha1-3)GlcNAc. The three MAbs against Lewis x show some minor differences in their reactivity such as recognizing their antigens on CD11/CD18 integrins after endo-beta-galactosidase treatment and recognizing free Lewis x. The hydroxyl group on C-3 of the terminal galactose is important for recognition by MAb CI-1, BU60, and HIM95 as its substitution with sulfo group of sialic acid abolishes the binding of these MAbs. The C-3 sialic acid is crucial for the binding of MAb HI247. Its replacement by sulphate or its cleavage by sialidase eliminates recognition by this MAb. MAbs HI247 and CSLEX-1 did not react in ELISA with immobilized CD11/CD18, suggesting that the majority of sialyl Lewis x on CD11/CD18 molecules may have sialic acid 6-linked rather than 3-linked to galactose. Unexpectedly, MAb BU60 inhibited binding of P-selectin mu chain chimera to HL-60 or U937 cells, while CI-1, HIM95 and three other defined anti-Lewis x MAbs (6C7, M6-1 and LeuM1) did not. MAb HI247 inhibited binding of both E- and P-selectin chimeras to these cell lines more effectively than several characterized MAbs (CSLEX-1, FH6, HECA-452) to sialyl Lewis x and related oligosaccharides. Certain combinations of these anticarbohydrate MAbs had additive inhibitory effects on selectin binding, suggesting a potential application of these new MAbs in cell adhesion/migration and tumor metastasis studies.
使用流式细胞术、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、免疫沉淀和蛋白质印迹、碳水化合物表位图谱分析、糖苷酶切割以及竞争结合测定等方法对四种新开发的单克隆抗体(MAb)进行了表征。测试了它们对选择素与髓样细胞结合的影响。这些单克隆抗体仅与髓样细胞发生反应。单克隆抗体CI-1、BU60和HIM95识别由CD11/CD18(β2)整合素表达的表位,而HI247和CSLEX1则不识别。基于与寡糖-聚丙烯酰胺-生物素或寡糖-BSA缀合物的反应性,这些表位需要Lewis x [Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAc]。单克隆抗体HI247识别一种相关结构,唾液酸化Lewis x,NeuAcα2-3Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAc。三种针对Lewis x的单克隆抗体在反应性上表现出一些细微差异,例如在内切β-半乳糖苷酶处理后在CD11/CD18整合素上识别其抗原以及识别游离的Lewis x。末端半乳糖C-3上的羟基对于单克隆抗体CI-1、BU60和HIM95的识别很重要,因为用唾液酸的磺酸基团取代会消除这些单克隆抗体的结合。C-3唾液酸对于单克隆抗体HI247的结合至关重要。用硫酸盐取代或用唾液酸酶切割会消除该单克隆抗体的识别。单克隆抗体HI247和CSLEX-1在ELISA中不与固定化的CD11/CD18发生反应,这表明CD11/CD18分子上的大多数唾液酸化Lewis x可能具有与半乳糖6-连接而非3-连接的唾液酸。出乎意料的是,单克隆抗体BU60抑制P-选择素μ链嵌合体与HL-60或U937细胞的结合,而CI-1、HIM95和其他三种已确定的抗Lewis x单克隆抗体(6C7、M6-1和LeuM1)则没有。单克隆抗体HI247比几种已表征的针对唾液酸化Lewis x和相关寡糖的单克隆抗体(CSLEX-1、FH6、HECA-452)更有效地抑制E-选择素和P-选择素嵌合体与这些细胞系的结合。这些抗碳水化合物单克隆抗体的某些组合对选择素结合具有相加抑制作用,这表明这些新的单克隆抗体在细胞粘附/迁移和肿瘤转移研究中具有潜在应用。