Ikeda Y, Yasuno H, Sato A, Kawai K
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan.
Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Dec;39(6):286-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1998.tb05943.x.
This investigation was conducted to study the relationship between the different intensities of sensitization to urushiol induced by the maximization test method (MT) or by the ear-flank method (EF) in guinea pigs, and hyposensitization induced by repeated oral and/or epicutaneous administration of the allergen, and to compare the immune tolerance achieved between these routes of dosing. During the observation period of 10 weeks, both oral and epicutaneous administration produced hyposensitization to urushiol after weak sensitization by EF; however, only combined administrations via the oral and epicutaneous routes achieved hyposensitization after potent sensitization, while inadequate tolerance was induced by oral dosing and none by epicutaneous dosing. Thus, it is indicated that difficulty in establishing immune tolerance may increase with increasing intensity of primary sensitization, and that hyposensitizing potency tends to increase in the order epicutaneous, oral and combined (e.p.+p.o.) administrations of urushiol.
