Kimme-Smith C, Lewis C, Beifuss M, Williams M B, Bassett L W
Iris Cantor Center for Breast Imaging, University of California, Los Angeles 90024, USA.
Med Phys. 1998 Dec;25(12):2410-6. doi: 10.1118/1.598452.
Methods are developed to establish minimum performance standards, calibration intervals, and criteria for exposure control for a whole breast digital mammography system. A prototype phantom was designed, and an automatic method programmed, to analyze CNR, resolution, and dynamic range between CCD components in the image receptor and over time. The phantom was imaged over a 5 month period and the results are analyzed to predict future performance. White field recalibration was analyzed by subtracting white fields obtained at different intervals. Exposure effects were compared by imaging the prototype phantom at different kVp, filtration (Mo vs Rh) and mAs. Calcification detection tests showed that phantom images, obtained at 28 kVp with a Mo/Mo anode/filter and low mAs technique, often could not depict Al2O3 specks 0.24 mm in diameter, while a 28 kVp Mo/Rh, higher mAs technique usually could. Stability of the system tested suggests that monthly phantom imaging may suffice. Differences in CCD performance are greater (12%) than differences in a single CCD over time (6%). White field recalibration is needed weekly because of pixel variations in sensitivity which occur if longer intervals between recalibration occur. When mean glandular dose is matched, Rh filtration gives better phantom performance at 28 kVp than Mo filtration at 26 kVp and is recommended for clinical exposures. An aluminum step wedge shows markedly increased dynamic range when exit exposure is increased by using a higher energy spectrum beam. Phantoms for digital mammography units should cover the entire image receptor, should test intersections between components of the receptor, and should be automatically analyzed.
